Closed Bug 124933 Opened 24 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Success indicator should distinguish between changing builtin object token and device token password

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Security: UI, enhancement, P2)

x86
Windows 2000
enhancement

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: junruh, Assigned: timeless)

Details

(Whiteboard: [kerh-coz])

Attachments

(1 file)

1.) Install a hardware token. 2.) Tasks>Privacy>Password>Change Password. 3.) Change the password on the hardware token. What happens: I get "Master Password successfully changed". This doesn't seem correct, since I didn't really change the master password.
Technically, the password for a token is also called the master password. Maybe a better thing to do would be to change both the change master pwd and the success dialog to say something like: "Change Master Password for a device" "Master Password for the device successfully changed" for the latter message, we can go one step further and name the device (more work).
Priority: -- → P2
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Mass reassign ssaux bugs to nobody
Assignee: ssaux → nobody
Mass change "Future" target milestone to "--" on bugs that now are assigned to nobody. Those targets reflected the prioritization of past PSM management. Many of these should be marked invalid or wontfix, I think.
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Product: PSM → Core
Whiteboard: [kerh-coz]
QA Contact: junruh → ui
Version: psm2.2 → 1.0 Branch
Severity: normal → enhancement
Summary: Password change success dialog wording incorrect. → Success indicator should distinguish between changing builtin object token and device token password
Version: 1.0 Branch → Trunk
would someone please send me a token device :)
Assignee: nobody → timeless
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #329083 - Flags: review?(kaie)
Bob, is this proposed change desirable from your point of view?
This bug proposes to use different wording for changing the master password. In particular it proposes, whenever the token name is different than "Builtin Object Token", the wording shall include "your device's" in addition to "master password". Bob, what's your opinion? Good change or unnecessary?
You mean from the software token? I don't have a problem with adding the term 'your device's, but I would use the call PK11_IsHW() to decide to use it. The builtin softoken isn't the only possible software device (there's one that is common for mac users that gives access to the mac keyring). bob
Actually it would be better to give the token that the password was changed for rather than a vague "master password" or "your device". bob
Comment on attachment 329083 [details] [diff] [review] i don't know if you can reach the failure cases, but this seems to be the general idea r- , patch should get enhanced based on suggestions
Attachment #329083 - Flags: review?(kaie) → review-
If this is really important to someone, I will assist them in fixing this bug, but otherwise I don't think it's worth the time to fix.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: