Closed
Bug 1249351
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Service worker installation stalls in bad state during sw-toolbox test case (or probably any importScripts of more than one script)
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Service Workers, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla47
People
(Reporter: bkelly, Assigned: bzbarsky)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: dom-triaged btpp-active)
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
3.51 KB,
patch
|
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.90 KB,
patch
|
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Matt Gaunt reports that if you:
1) git clone https://github.com/GoogleChrome/sw-toolbox.git
2) git checkout 312839e77b9d61d9dde226cd3085fa336dfde8de
4) npm install; npm install grunt; grunt test:manual
5) Load localhost:8888 in firefox
The service worker script will stall. Upon restarting the service worker registration cannot be unregistered.
Running this locally I see:
Error: Script terminated by timeout at:
[12]</<@http://ubuntu:8888/sw-toolbox.js:40:1324
EventListener.handleEvent*[12]<@http://ubuntu:8888/sw-toolbox.js:40:914
s@http://ubuntu:8888/sw-toolbox.js:17:613
e@http://ubuntu:8888/sw-toolbox.js:17:792
@http://ubuntu:8888/sw-toolbox.js:17:378
@http://ubuntu:8888/sw-toolbox.js:17:317
@http://ubuntu:8888/sw-toolbox.js:17:2
@http://ubuntu:8888/test/browser-tests/router-get/serviceworkers/origin-matching.js:21:1
And a broken registration in about:serviceworkers:
Origin: http://ubuntu:8888
Scope: http://ubuntu:8888/test/iframe/145582008400926
Script Spec:
Current Worker URL:
Active Cache Name:
Waiting Cache Name:
Push Endpoint: null
Matt noticed that if he changes this line:
importScripts('/sw-toolbox.js', '/test/data/skip-and-claim.js');
To:
importScripts('/sw-toolbox.js');
importScripts('/test/data/skip-and-claim.js');
Then everything works.
I suspect that skipWaiting() is executing before the rest of the install handler and doing bad things.
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Blocks: ServiceWorkers-compat
It might need to be gulp rather than grunt unless there is something clever there.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Typo on my part. It is indeed gulp.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
The broken registration in about:serviceworkers is a recent regression described in bug 1246319 comment 31. Lets see if this is still a problem after the fix for that merges to nightly.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
I meant bug 1246319 comment 37.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Note you need to use this git rev to reproduce the problem:
ae6ed61cd97173e6693681ceae1fe3a6807e8dbd
The rev in comment 0 has the workaround in place.
With this I see the tests stall once they hit "Test router.get method" cases.
Just in case it helps - the router.get methods are the tests that register service workers with the multiple importScript arguments.
Refreshing the page after hitting the failing tests should illustrate the previous tests (there were passing) now fail.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
I see start the ScriptLoader.cpp code with 2 URLs, but we never get to its completed state. So this seems to be a bug in the ScriptLoader somewhere.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: dom-triaged btpp-active
Do you want me to investigate? If so you need to set ni, not just CC me :)
Flags: needinfo?(bkelly)
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
I was going to NI you if I didn't figure it out today. But it seems I might have gotten Boris look at it. :-)
Flags: needinfo?(bkelly)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Ben and I poked at this a bit. The problem is that when doing serviceworker cache stuff we're storing mReader on the script loader runnable, but that runnable handles _all_ the script loads. So we end up having multiple loadinfos all waiting on the same stream, but only one gets notified. We need to store a separate stream for each loadinfo that's doing cache stuff.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
Not sure about the right name for this member, or how to create tests for this...
Attachment #8721500 -
Flags: review?(bkelly)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
And with that patch, reloading the page reruns the tests correctly too.
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8721500 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix, fixes the STR from comment 0
Review of attachment 8721500 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks! I'll see if I can write a test quick tonight.
Attachment #8721500 -
Flags: review?(bkelly) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
status-firefox44:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox45:
--- → affected
status-firefox46:
--- → affected
status-firefox47:
--- → affected
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
This stalls and times out without your fix. It passes with the fix.
Attachment #8721570 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
Oh, I also cleaned up the test a little bit in the patch. That comment was wrong. A non-existent script should throw.
Since I'm going on PTO, do you mind getting this landed and uplifted? Ideally we would like it in beta, but I know its late in the cycle.
Thanks!
Assignee: bkelly → bzbarsky
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
Yeah, I can get this in. But not until Monday.
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
Thank you! Next week would be great.
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8721570 [details] [diff] [review]
P2 Clean up test_importscript.html and add multiple-url importScript() case. r=bz
This is missing lorum_script.js. I'm not sure what that needs to contain to reliably reproduce this bug. :(
Attachment #8721570 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8721570 [details] [diff] [review]
P2 Clean up test_importscript.html and add multiple-url importScript() case. r=bz
I guess I'll try making lorum_script.js just contain a short lorem ipsum string. That seems to trigger a failure on this test...
r=me with that.
Attachment #8721570 -
Flags: review- → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Summary: Service worker installation stalls in bad state during sw-toolbox test case → Service worker installation stalls in bad state during sw-toolbox test case (or probably any importScripts of more than one script)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 22•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8721500 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix, fixes the STR from comment 0
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]: Bug 1156847.
[User impact if declined]: Some totally legitimate uses of service workers will
end up completely wedging the service worker, requiring a browser restart to
recover. Oh, and browser shutdown won't really complete either.
[Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: Patch has test, and we have
various other serviceworker tests.
[Risks and why]: I think the risk is very low (never thought I'd say this about
worker code). This will only affect importScripts() calls with more than
one argument, will only affect them in the serviceworker case, and will change them from hanging to not hanging.
[String/UUID change made/needed]: None.
Note that I realize the regressing bug is claimed to be fixed in 40. But serviceworkers in general were off by default until 44 (see bug 1226686), and this bug seems bad enough that I think we should uplift it to 45... As people use serviceworkers more now that we've enabled them, they're more and more likely to hit this.
Attachment #8721500 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8721500 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8721500 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8721500 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8721500 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8721570 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8722172 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8722172 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8722173 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8722173 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Reporter | ||
Comment 24•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Zbarsky [:bz] from comment #19)
> Comment on attachment 8721570 [details] [diff] [review]
> P2 Clean up test_importscript.html and add multiple-url importScript() case.
> r=bz
>
> I guess I'll try making lorum_script.js just contain a short lorem ipsum
> string. That seems to trigger a failure on this test...
>
> r=me with that.
Yes, it was a file with 10k bytes of lorum ipsum string. Sorry I forgot the hg add!
Comment 25•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a817cee8f9e6
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c83f7bf632c1
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla47
Comment 26•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8722172 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch with actual commit message and the like
Make sense, taking it.
Should be 45 beta 10.
Attachment #8722172 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8722172 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #8722172 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #8722172 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8722173 [details] [diff] [review]
Test
Many thanks for tests, taking it too.
Attachment #8722173 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8722173 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #8722173 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #8722173 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 28•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Comment 29•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•