1251421 - Intermittent webgl-color-test.html?frame=6&readback&aa&________&_______&alpha | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 1713

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1249478

(Core :: Graphics: CanvasWebGL, defect)

Description

[Wes Kocher (:KWierso) (Not reading bugmail; email directly if needed)]

https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=22401107&repo=mozilla-inbound
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/layout/tools/reftest/reftest-analyzer.xhtml#logurl=http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/tinderbox-builds/mozilla-inbound-android-api-15-debug/1456410928/mozilla-inbound_ubuntu64_vm_armv7_large-debug_test-plain-reftest-17-bm54-tests1-linux64-build13.txt.gz&only_show_unexpected=1

Comment 1

[Joel Maher ( :jmaher ) (UTC -8)]

this could be a dup of bug 1123545 and bug 1249478.

I found this bug and those bugs as i see a few failures in android 2.3 r17:

REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/dom/canvas/test/reftest/webgl-color-test.html?frame=6&aa&________&premult&_____ | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 1713
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/dom/canvas/test/reftest/webgl-color-test.html?frame=6&__&preserve&_______&alpha | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 1713
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/dom/canvas/test/reftest/webgl-color-test.html?frame=6&aa&________&premult&alpha | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 1713
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/dom/canvas/test/reftest/webgl-color-test.html?frame=6&readback&aa&________&_______&_____ | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 1713
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/dom/canvas/test/reftest/webgl-color-test.html?frame=6&readback&__&preserve&premult&alpha | image comparison (==), max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 1713 

:KWierso, can you figure out which bug(s) we need and sort out any dups?

Comment 2

[Joel Maher ( :jmaher ) (UTC -8)]

also this is marked 45 branch, it was filed on inbound yesterday, inbound is v.47.

Comment 3

[Wes Kocher (:KWierso) (Not reading bugmail; email directly if needed)]

1123545 was an unexpected pass, so I don't think that's a dupe. 1249478 looks like it could be this. Unsure why it wasn't showing up as a suggestion...

(In reply to Joel Maher (:jmaher) from comment #2)
> also this is marked 45 branch, it was filed on inbound yesterday, inbound is
> v.47.

Ugh, some product/component pairs here default to trunk versions, others seem to have been left behind on older versions...