Closed Bug 1251477 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

prep buildbot configs for release promotion in production on beta

Categories

(Release Engineering :: Release Automation: Other, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jlund, Assigned: jlund)

References

Details

Attachments

(5 files)

No description provided.
Assignee: nobody → jlund
Comment on attachment 8723874 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1251477 - prep buildbot configs for release promotion in production on beta, r?rail https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/36779/#review33603 ::: mozilla/config.py:2633 (Diff revision 1) > +} I couldn't find where we use stage_product as a dict... There is an entry for date in the configs, but I'm not sure if it's varlid... ::: mozilla/config.py:2644 (Diff revision 1) > +### `balrog_api_root` available only in release configs (NA in relpro) is missing
Attachment #8723874 - Flags: review?(rail)
(In reply to Rail Aliiev [:rail] from comment #2) > I couldn't find where we use stage_product as a dict... There is an entry > for date in the configs, but I'm not sure if it's varlid... Found it, http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/file/tip/process/release.py#l1948 > `balrog_api_root` available only in release configs (NA in relpro) is missing And this is set in mozilla/production_config.py, r+
Comment on attachment 8723874 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1251477 - prep buildbot configs for release promotion in production on beta, r?rail https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/36779/#review33605
Attachment #8723874 - Flags: review+
Blocks: 1253429
Comment on attachment 8723874 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1251477 - prep buildbot configs for release promotion in production on beta, r?rail Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/36779/diff/1-2/
Comment on attachment 8726492 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1251477 - prep beta for release promotion, update buckets key name bbot-cfgs, r?rail https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/38051/#review34583
Attachment #8726492 - Flags: review?(rail) → review+
HG#: added release/updates/mozilla-beta-firefox-win32.cfg Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/38227/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/38227/
Attachment #8726773 - Flags: review?(jlund)
Comment on attachment 8726773 [details] MozReview Request: bug 1251477 - fix symlink names r=jlund https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/38227/#review34791 surrrreeeee .... ? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Attachment #8726773 - Flags: review?(jlund) → review+
Comment on attachment 8726773 [details] MozReview Request: bug 1251477 - fix symlink names r=jlund https://hg.mozilla.org/build/tools/rev/d3ad12b07785
Attachment #8726773 - Flags: checked-in+
Depends on: 1254337
Comment on attachment 8726773 [details] MozReview Request: bug 1251477 - fix symlink names r=jlund Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/38227/diff/1-2/
Attachment #8726773 - Attachment description: MozReview Request: Bug 1251477 - Symlink update verify configs to meet the new naming schema r=jlund → MozReview Request: bug 1251477 - fix symlink names r=jlund
symlinks + windows = sadness :(
* get rid of symlinks * rename configs to match the new naming schema
Attachment #8728290 - Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Attachment #8728291 - Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Comment on attachment 8728290 [details] [diff] [review] rename_configs.diff I assume this is right, but I'm not really plugged into it...sending it jlund's way.
Attachment #8728290 - Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review?(jlund)
Attachment #8728291 - Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review?(jlund)
Attachment #8728290 - Flags: review?(jlund) → review+
Attachment #8728291 - Flags: review?(jlund) → review+
All done here!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: