Closed
Bug 126016
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
brownish bars at the top are rendered too thick
Categories
(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: English US, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: timonchristl, Assigned: doronr)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
979 bytes,
application/zip
|
Details |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 BuildID: 2002020415 Most pages on java.sun.com have several brownish horizontal bars at the top of the page. On the main page (http://java.sun.com/) this looks ok, but on some pages the bars are rendered way too thick, each bar is then about as high as the entire bundle of bars ought to be. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to http://java.sun.com/ 2. See bars at the top 3. Go to http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4 4. See bars at the top Actual Results: Bars are too thick Expected Results: Bars should not be that thick
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Problem disappears when using quirks mode. I guess this is Bug 22274. Maybe it should be moved to Tech Evang. (no dups found)
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
This is definitely bug 22274. Over to evang (the front page is HTML 3.2, while the other page is 4.01 Transitional with URI).
Assignee: attinasi → doronr
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Layout → US General
Ever confirmed: true
Product: Browser → Tech Evangelism
QA Contact: petersen → zach
Version: other → unspecified
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 126593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 131148 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 136449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
they use the same code all over the site, also: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 139502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 138690 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 144441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 144872 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
Am including comments from 144441, since they are more detailed: When using HTML 4.01 DTD (http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/loose.dtd), and rendering a table that has a cell spanning more than one row that contains an image, then the cell is not as tall as the image, but is ROWSPAN-times as tall as the image. The remaining cells that span only one row are as tall as the image in the multi-row cell. For instance, if an image 10 pixels high is in a table cell spanning 7 rows, then that cell will be 70 pixels high, and each of the other cells will be 10 pixels high. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Get attached archive file, rowspan.zip. 2. Unzip files into a temporary directory (rowspan.html, pixel.gif, stripelt.gif, stripert.gif). 3. View the file rowspan.html in Mozilla Navigator. Actual Results: The left and right cells of the table will be 7x14, or 98, pixels high, and each of the middle rows will be 14 pixels high. Expected Results: The entire table should be 14 pixels high, and each of the middle rows should be 2 pixels high. The effect is for the stripes in the left and right images to be seamlessly reproduced across the middle of the table. This table is displayed correctly if you change the DTD to HTML 3.2. > ------- Additional Comment #4 From Boris Zbarsky 2002-05-14 23:24 ------- > > The page is in standards mode and that is the correct rendering of that markup > per the standards... Are you sure? This seems like kind-of quirky behavior, to multiply the height of the image by the number of rows, and use that for the height of the rowspanned cell. Please check it out.
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 145697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 146866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
jckeatley: This issue is a well-known non-bug. http://www.mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html#gaps http://developer.netscape.com/evangelism/docs/articles/img-table/
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
It is very interesting! Why it is not bug? 1. All such bars are on almost every page of this site. 2. In ALL other browsers this page looks fine.
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
> Why it is not bug? Did you read the pages I referred to in my previous comment? <img> is an inline element and, therefore, has display: inline; by default. As per the CSS2 spec, a line box is generated where there is inline content. The content of that box depends on line-height and not on the dimensions of the content. The default computed value for line-height depends on the font size. See also bug 22274. > 1. All such bars are on almost every page of this site. But the problem showed up only recently although Mozilla has been behaving this way for a long time. This suggests that Sun changed a site-wide template recently, which means that they can change it again. > 2. In ALL other browsers this page looks fine. Then the other browsers aren't doing exactly what the CSS2 spec says.
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
I checked next HTML editors: 1. MS FrontPage, 2. OpenOffice.org HTML Editor, 3. Macromedia HomeSite 5, 4. Lorenz Graf's HTMLtool 3.5, 5. HTML Webmaster 2.0 6. Oracle JDeveloper HTML (JSP) editor, 7. Borland JBuilder JSP editor. I pasted there the source of this http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4 page. In the preview mode it looks fine. Then the most interesting thing I did the same with Mozilla Composer. And guess what? It shows this HTML correct. If I understand this correctly and you are right then Mozilla Composer isn't doing exactly what the CSS2 spec says.
Comment 20•22 years ago
|
||
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/ changed layout recently, hence this bug doesn't occur anymore. comment 18 says this was not a "bug" anyway. Propose to mark WFM.
Reporter | ||
Comment 21•22 years ago
|
||
Resolving as WORKSFORME
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Tech Evangelism Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•