Closed
Bug 12721
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Client-side image maps with spaces in name ignore spaces
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
INVALID
M13
People
(Reporter: run2000, Assigned: pnunn)
Details
(Whiteboard: [TESTCASE])
Attachments
(1 file)
1.16 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
This bug follows on from bug 11453. Tested on: Mozilla 1999082708, M10 build, Windows NT 4 Workstation. Expected bahaviour: For the test case attached, the client-side image map should not work. The map name contains a space in the middle of it, while the usemap attribute of the image does not contain this space. Current bahaviour: The image map works as if nothing is wrong. Other browsers tested: Opera 3.60 and Internet Explorer 5 behave as expected. Other comments: Be careful not to re-open bug 11453 when fixing this.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [TESTCASE]
Assignee: vidur → chofmann
This isn't a DOM/vidur bug. Calgon -- ahem, chofmann -- take me away!
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: chofmann → pnunn
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
not sure if I understand why this is bad... looks like a pretty good graceful failure. maybe pnunn can figure out what to do.
Let me get this straight. The complaint is that the image map works, right? -pn
This apparently is a *feature* implemented in nsImageFrame::GetImageMap(). usemap.StripWhitespace() is called for a NAV quirk. See line 563 in nsImageFrame.cpp. This isn't really an imglib problem. I'd be happy to take this one, if you are short handed. Looks like Kipp did alot of the work in this area. Reassign back to me if you'd like. -pn
The question now is do we support the Nav quirk or not... I have no strong feelings on the subject either way. If communicator ignored spaces before, what is the advantage to suddenly start paying attention to them? -pn
Can anyone give me a reason to not support the Nav quirk of ignoring spaces in image map names? Convince me or I mark the bug invalid. -p
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Marking verified invalid per last comments.
This bug has wrong resolution. This bug is not INVALID, it should be WONTFIX. Aside from that, I am wondering if this should be fixed for strict mode. What does IE do? Adding harishd to CC.
Comment hidden (collapsed) |
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•