Open
Bug 1272223
Opened 9 years ago
Updated 1 year ago
Feature request: Message compose window should warn user when replying to the message where recipient differs from sender due to header REPLY TO.
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Compose Window, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
UNCONFIRMED
People
(Reporter: u571238, Unassigned)
References
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/49.0.2623.108 Chrome/49.0.2623.108 Safari/537.36
Steps to reproduce:
1. Somebody sent incoming e-mail with different FROM and REPLY-TO headers. Please note that same situation might occur when SENDER and FROM headers aren't same.
2. User is not an IT expert - he does not know he will reply to another account than he might thought. Even IT expert can be inattentive for a while.
3. User hits "Reply" button, writes his reply and hits "Send" button.
Actual results:
Message is sent. Reply is sent to another account than original message came from and user is surprised (better case) or he does not noticed (usual case).
Expected results:
Message optionally could warn "Recipient differs from sender! Accept? [Yes] [No] [Learn more]".
Note: In my personal opinion it should be by default ON but this feature is breaking current behavior so it may by set at preferences optionally, default OFF.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
Reporter makes very thoughtful points. This feature is a good countermeasure against email spoofing, phishing, email fraud and all sorts of scams. Not a cure-all of course, but an added protective layer.
This could be implemented in the same way users are warned about remote images:
yellow warning bar below the mail header with [x] to close.
I think the reporter's suggestion for the warning text is good, but could be further clarified, such as:
Sender asks you to to reply to a different address than the sender's address. Accept? [YES] [NO] [NO, use sender address instead] [learn more] [X]
Spontaneous thoughts for button behaviour:
- YES: warning disappears, no action is taken (i.e. TO address remains)
- NO: deletes the TO field
- NO, use sender address instead: the TO field (populated by REPLY-TO) is replaced by the sender address
- [X]: defaults to NO
- learn more: overlay/popup with a brief summary of the potential danger, like "If you don't know the sender, this could be a phishing attempt." (+ maybe also explaining the button behaviour ?)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•