Closed
Bug 1283934
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
New Fields: last-good/last-good-disabled/first-bad in bugs that have -[product]-statusNN flags
Categories
(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: General, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: emceeaich, Unassigned)
References
Details
User Story
As a bugzilla user, I want to see at a glance the regression range of a bug, so I can make decisions about the bug.
The status-firefoxNN flags require substantial client processing to determine regression and fix ranges for bugs. We'd like a set of computed fields, based on the -status-firefoxNN flags to make a bug's regression range more immediately obvious and/or signal an inconsistency in a bug's metadata. last-good: non-decimal version number of earliest firefox release where -status-firefoxNN is unaffected last-good-disabled: non-decimal version number of earliest firefox release where -status-firefoxNN is one of fixed, disabled, verified-disabled, or verified first-bad: non-decimal version number of earliest firefox release where -status-firefoxNN is affected These fields should be displayed in a bug's summary. It would be good if there's a field shadowing this that indicates which train–nightly, aurora, beta, release, previous-release–corresponds to the version numbers above.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
This is higher priority than the "which release train" work.
Priority: -- → P1
{Unblock}bug fix(In reply to Emma Humphries ☕️ [:emceeaich] (UTC-8) NEEDINFO? me from comment #0) > The status-firefoxNN flags require substantial client processing to > determine regression and fix ranges for bugs. > > We'd like a set of computed fields, based on the -status-firefoxNN flags to > make a bug's regression range more immediately obvious and/or signal an > inconsistency in a bug's metadata. > > last-good: non-decimal version number of earliest firefox release where > -status-firefoxNN is unaffected > last-good-disabled: non-decimal version number of earliest firefox release > where -status-firefoxNN is one of fixed, disabled, verified-disabled, or > verified > first-bad: non-decimal version number of earliest firefox release where > -status-firefoxNN is affected > > These fields should be displayed in a bug's summary. > > It would be good if there's a field shadowing this that indicates which > train–nightly, aurora, beta, release, previous-release–corresponds to the > version numbers above.
Flags: needinfo?(commrer)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dkl
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: dkl → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Priority: P1 → P2
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•