Open
Bug 1297305
Opened 8 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
[Test] Move the test of document-timeline to web platform tests.
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Animation, defect, P5)
Core
DOM: Animation
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: mantaroh, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: good-first-bug)
Attachments
(1 file)
We have document timeline test in dom/animation/test/document-timeline. I think that this behavior of test is the behavior of specification[1], so we can move this test to the web platform test. (testing/web-platform/tests/web-animation/interface/DocumentTimeline/) We should care about following point: - We prefer to use the promise_test instead of async_test. - We can't use the SimpleTest.js, use the testharness.js. [2] [1] https://w3c.github.io/web-animations/#timelines [2] https://github.com/w3c/testharness.js/blob/master/docs/api.md Perhaps the changeset of bug 1258972 will help this bug.
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → begeeben
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8785550 [details] Bug 1297305 - Move the test of document-timeline to web platform tests, https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/74726/#review72570 Thanks for doing this. This looks good, but I'd like to check it again with the following changes: ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:3 (Diff revision 1) > +<!doctype html> > +<meta charset=utf-8> > +<title>Web Animations API: DocumentTimeline tests</title> Can we split this into two files: * web-animations/interfaces/Document/timeline.html - the first test * web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/currentTime.html - the remaining tests ? ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:24 (Diff revision 1) > +{ > + help: 'http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/web-animations/#the-document-timeline', > + assert: [ 'Each document has a timeline called the document timeline' ], > + author: 'Brian Birtles' > +}); We can drop these lines since we no longer use them. ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:47 (Diff revision 1) > + t.step_func(function(rafTime) { > + assert_equals(document.timeline.currentTime, rafTime, > + 'document.timeline.currentTime matches' + > + ' requestAnimationFrame time'); > + t.done(); > + }); I don't think we need step_func when we have a promise test? See: https://github.com/w3c/testharness.js/blob/master/docs/api.md#promise-tests ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:56 (Diff revision 1) > +{ > + help: [ > + 'http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/web-animations/#the-global-clock', > + 'http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/web-animations/#the-document-timeline' > + ], > + assert: [ > + 'The global clock is a source of monotonically increasing time values', > + 'The time values of the document timeline are calculated as a fixed' + > + ' offset from the global clock', > + 'the zero time corresponds to the navigationStart moment', > + 'the time value of each document timeline must be equal to the time ' + > + 'passed to animation frame request callbacks for that browsing context' > + ], > + author: 'Brian Birtles' > +}); Again, I think we can drop need this metadata. ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:89 (Diff revision 1) > +{ > + help: 'http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/web-animations/#script-execution-and-live-updates-to-the-model', > + assert: [ 'The value returned by the currentTime attribute of a' + > + ' document timeline will not change within a script block' ], > + author: 'Brian Birtles' > +}); We can drop this metadata too. ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:140 (Diff revision 1) > + if (hiddenIFrame.contentDocument.readyState === 'complete') { > + testToRunOnLoad(); > + } else { > + hiddenIFrame.addEventListener("load", testToRunOnLoad); > + } This promise_test doesn't return a promise so I think we need to rework it.
Attachment #8785550 -
Flags: review?(bbirtles)
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8785550 [details] Bug 1297305 - Move the test of document-timeline to web platform tests, https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/74726/#review72650 This Yifan for doing this! r=me with the following changes made. Let me know if you don't have time to do it, however, and I can take care of it. ::: testing/web-platform/meta/MANIFEST.json:30465 (Diff revision 2) > + "path": "web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html", > + "url": "/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html" We should name this test: web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/currentTime.html ::: testing/web-platform/meta/web-animations/interfaces/Animation/document-timeline.html.ini:1 (Diff revision 2) > +[document-timeline.html] > + type: testharness > + [document.timeline.currentTime hidden subframe test] > + expected: FAIL > + bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298573 > + Do we still need this? This test passes for me. In any case, this file seems to be in the wrong place (under 'Animation' instead of 'DocumentTimeline') ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/Document/timeline.html:3 (Diff revision 2) > +<!doctype html> > +<meta charset=utf-8> > +<title>Web Animations API: Timeline tests</title> Let's just call this 'document.timeline tests' ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/Document/timeline.html:4 (Diff revision 2) > +<!doctype html> > +<meta charset=utf-8> > +<title>Web Animations API: Timeline tests</title> > +<link rel="help" href="https://w3c.github.io/web-animations/#timelines"> Let's use the following URL here: https://w3c.github.io/web-animations/#the-documents-default-timeline ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:3 (Diff revision 2) > +<!doctype html> > +<meta charset=utf-8> > +<title>Web Animations API: DocumentTimeline tests</title> Likewise, let's just call this 'DocumentTimeline.currentTime tests' ::: testing/web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/DocumentTimeline/document-timeline.html:4 (Diff revision 2) > +<!doctype html> > +<meta charset=utf-8> > +<title>Web Animations API: DocumentTimeline tests</title> > +<link rel="help" href="https://w3c.github.io/web-animations/#timelines"> Perhaps "https://w3c.github.io/web-animations/#document-timelines" is better here
Attachment #8785550 -
Flags: review?(bbirtles) → review+
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Oh, I've just noticed that we already have web-platform/tests/web-animations/interfaces/AnimationTimeline/document-timeline.html which contains half of these tests already. I guess we should remove that file after checking that we have the same tests here.
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Pushed to try with the suggested changes to see if the failing test fails there too: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=3fe20aef56e5
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review-reply |
Comment on attachment 8785550 [details] Bug 1297305 - Move the test of document-timeline to web platform tests, https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/74726/#review72650 Thank you! I can do this.
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Brian Birtles (:birtles) from comment #6) > Pushed to try with the suggested changes to see if the failing test fails > there too: > https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=3fe20aef56e5 Oops, left a stray comma there. Trying again: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=3b44e64c3aed
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review-reply |
Comment on attachment 8785550 [details] Bug 1297305 - Move the test of document-timeline to web platform tests, https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/74726/#review72650 > Do we still need this? This test passes for me. > > In any case, this file seems to be in the wrong place (under 'Animation' instead of 'DocumentTimeline') It still fails on my laptop, maybe it's a platform thing?
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review-reply |
Comment on attachment 8785550 [details] Bug 1297305 - Move the test of document-timeline to web platform tests, https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/74726/#review72650 > It still fails on my laptop, maybe it's a platform thing? I ran the test on a Mac.
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
Just FYI, I did run the test on Linux. It fails when I run only currentTime.html, it does not fail if I run both of test files, i.e. specifying DocumentTimeline directory.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P5
Updated•4 years ago
|
Keywords: good-first-bug
Whiteboard: [good first bug]
Comment 13•3 years ago
|
||
This good-first-bug hasn't had any activity for 6 months, it is automatically unassigned.
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Assignee: begeeben → nobody
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•