Closed
Bug 1308474
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Add the new StartupCrash annotation to SuperSearch
Categories
(Socorro :: General, task)
Socorro
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: marco, Assigned: adrian)
References
Details
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Added as `startup_crash`. See for example: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/search/?product=Firefox&_facets=startup_crash&_columns=startup_crash#facet-startup_crash Note that the mapping for this field has been changed, so its operators will only start working when we create a new Elasticsearch index next Monday.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Wait, actually, what kind of data does this field have? Is it a string or is it a number? If it's 0 or 1, then we can turn that into a boolean, but if it's strings then that won't work.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Adrian Gaudebert [:adrian] from comment #2) > Wait, actually, what kind of data does this field have? Is it a string or is > it a number? If it's 0 or 1, then we can turn that into a boolean, but if > it's strings then that won't work. It's a string that can assume one of two values, '0' or '1', or be undefined. It's similar to safe_mode, which we are turning into a boolean. The only difference is that safe_mode is never undefined.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
OK, the `safe_mode` field seems to be working well, so I assume this one will go well too. Let's verify this next Monday! :)
Assignee: nobody → adrian
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago → 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
And could you add field desc to socorro:scripts/data/supersearch_fields.json ? Or this is not the correct place for one. Right now I'm experimenting with socorro installation with report and missing this field from 'socorro' index lead to exception on some reports pages.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Lehych, you might to follow bug 1100354. I've move it up in my list. In the meantime, you might be able to solve your problem using our public API (see the bug).
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•