Closed Bug 1309802 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Thousands of warning about unsupported color profile

Categories

(Core :: Audio/Video: Playback, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla52
Tracking Status
firefox52 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: jya, Assigned: sotaro)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

Using on Ubuntu 16.04 (that uses FFmpeg 2.8) The console is flooded with warnings like: [26160] WARNING: Unsupported yuv color space.: file /home/jyavenard/Work/Mozilla/mozilla-central/dom/media/platforms/ffmpeg/FFmpegVideoDecoder.cpp, line 314 [26160] WARNING: Unsupported yuv color space.: file /home/jyavenard/Work/Mozilla/mozilla-central/dom/media/platforms/ffmpeg/FFmpegVideoDecoder.cpp, line 314 [26160] WARNING: Unsupported yuv color space.: file /home/jyavenard/Work/Mozilla/mozilla-central/dom/media/platforms/ffmpeg/FFmpegVideoDecoder.cpp, line 314 [26160] WARNING: Unsupported yuv color space.: file /home/jyavenard/Work/Mozilla/mozilla-central/dom/media/platforms/ffmpeg/FFmpegVideoDecoder.cpp, line 314 [26160] WARNING: Unsupported yuv color space.: file /home/jyavenard/Work/Mozilla
Assignee: nobody → sotaro.ikeda.g
Attached patch patch - Supress warning (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8800545 - Flags: review?(jyavenard)
This is when playing a H264 video btw. The value of colorspace is 2 (AVCOL_SPC_UNSPECIFIED) Also seen when running the mediasource mochitests.
Comment on attachment 8800545 [details] [diff] [review] patch - Supress warning Review of attachment 8800545 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/media/platforms/ffmpeg/FFmpegVideoDecoder.cpp @@ -310,5 @@ > case AVCOL_SPC_BT470BG: > b.mYUVColorSpace = YUVColorSpace::BT601; > break; > - default: > - NS_WARNING("Unsupported yuv color space."); you're likely going to get some compilation warning that not all values are handled. so having a default: break is probably needed.
Attachment #8800545 - Flags: review?(jyavenard) → review+
Apply the comment.
Attachment #8800545 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8800561 - Flags: review+
Maybe it's better to add empty AVCOL_SPC_UNSPECIFIED case but leave warning? That way it will only warn for things like BT.2020.
(In reply to kagami from comment #5) > Maybe it's better to add empty AVCOL_SPC_UNSPECIFIED case but leave warning? > That way it will only warn for things like BT.2020. I am going to keep as attachment 8800561 [details] [diff] [review] in this patch. It seems enough for now.
I am going to re-visit to it in Bug 1210357.
(In reply to Sotaro Ikeda [:sotaro] from comment #7) > I am going to re-visit to it in Bug 1210357. Correction: I am going to re-visit to it in Bug 1305907.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla52
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: