Monterail Sample Thunderbird UI redesign
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: mkmelin, Assigned: Paenglab)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(18 files, 12 obsolete files)
|
498.47 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
1.17 MB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
1.24 MB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
1.23 MB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
9.15 MB,
application/x-sqlite3
|
Details | |
|
33.56 KB,
application/zip
|
Details | |
|
46.86 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
348.43 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
69.03 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
605.46 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
21.76 KB,
image/svg+xml
|
Details | |
|
65.93 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
6.80 KB,
application/zip
|
Details | |
|
9.02 KB,
application/zip
|
Details | |
|
87.06 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
147.69 KB,
application/x-xpinstall
|
Details | |
|
90.36 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
127.58 KB,
application/octet-stream
|
Details |
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•8 years ago
|
||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 18•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 21•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 22•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 23•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 24•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 25•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 26•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 27•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 28•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 29•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 30•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 31•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 32•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 33•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 34•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 35•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 36•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 37•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 38•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 39•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 40•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 41•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 42•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 43•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 44•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 45•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 46•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 47•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 48•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 49•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 50•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 51•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 52•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 53•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 54•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 55•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 56•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 57•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 58•8 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 59•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 60•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 61•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 62•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 63•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 64•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 65•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 66•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 67•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 68•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 69•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 70•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 71•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 72•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 73•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 74•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 75•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 76•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 77•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 78•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 79•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 80•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 81•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 82•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 83•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 84•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 85•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 86•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 87•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 88•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 89•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 90•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 91•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 92•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 93•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 94•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 95•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 96•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 97•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 98•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 99•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 100•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 101•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 102•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 103•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 104•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 105•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 106•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 107•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 108•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 109•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 110•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 111•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 112•8 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 113•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 114•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 115•7 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 116•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 117•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 118•7 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 119•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 120•7 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 121•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 122•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 123•6 years ago
|
||
This is the TB 68 compatible XPI. Because full themes are no more possible with TB 68, I changed it to a normal extension to be able to style more than would be possible with a normal WE-theme.
Comment 124•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Richard Marti (:Paenglab) from comment #123)
Created attachment 9093337 [details]
monterail-2.0-tb.xpi TB 68 compatibleThis is the TB 68 compatible XPI. Because full themes are no more possible with TB 68, I changed it to a normal extension to be able to style more than would be possible with a normal WE-theme.
Thank you for this update, Richard. I have installed this successfully on the latest TB 68.1 on Windows 10. I am a long time user of your theme and have followed development for quite some time now. So I am excited to see that it still has a future on TB 68+.
I have only noticed one issue thus far on Windows 10 / TB 68.1:
This latest 2.0 version of Monterail seems to only work correctly when I choose the Light theme. If I select Dark theme, or Default which automatically uses the theme from the OS (in my case Dark as well), I cannot view any of the text from within the Inbox such as Subject, From, etc. Everything within that entire section remains white. White background, white text, etc. So it seems that the main issue there is the color of the text. Typically in Dark mode in TB, that entire section is dark and the text is white. Therefore, your theme (when in Dark mode) is changing the entire section background to white, while the text is also remaining white and therefore with white on white you cannot see anything.
Please let me know if you would like me to test anything. I am happy to assist with any testing.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 125•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to wildbydesign from comment #124)
This latest 2.0 version of Monterail seems to only work correctly when I choose the Light theme. If I select Dark theme, or Default which automatically uses the theme from the OS (in my case Dark as well), I cannot view any of the text from within the Inbox such as Subject, From, etc. Everything within that entire section remains white. White background, white text, etc. So it seems that the main issue there is the color of the text. Typically in Dark mode in TB, that entire section is dark and the text is white. Therefore, your theme (when in Dark mode) is changing the entire section background to white, while the text is also remaining white and therefore with white on white you cannot see anything.
Yes, this is the disadvantage of this approach with not being a theme. The built-in- and WE-themes can have precedence. But I can look if I can improve it to use always the dark text. Thanks for the feedback.
Comment 126•6 years ago
|
||
Any chance of also implementing a dark version such as https://github.com/conema/monterail-dark ?
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 127•3 years ago
|
||
This hasn't evolved into a meta bug. Is it even still useful, given more recent design directions?
Comment 128•3 years ago
|
||
We can close this as we're going in a completely different direction.
Something like this should be an add-on theme.
Description
•