Closed
Bug 1325538
Opened 5 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Add mochitest for form autofill feature
Categories
(Toolkit :: Form Manager, defect, P3)
Toolkit
Form Manager
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla55
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox55 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: steveck, Assigned: steveck)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [form autofill:M2])
Attachments
(1 file)
We'll need a complete mochitest for form autofill once the main autofill architecture is ready.
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
The patch here is for autocomplete popup test in Bug 1304634, but we can wait for rest of functions(bug 1300989/bug 1300992/bug 1300993) ready and implement a complete mochitest after that.
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
I'd like to carry on with Steve's patch and make a precedent for mochitest.
Assignee: nobody → ralin
Updated•4 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [form autofill:M1] → [form autofill:M2]
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Assignee: ralin → schung
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8821457 [details] Bug 1325538 - Add mochitest for form autofill feature. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/100744/#review132824 ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/test_basic_autocomplete_form.html:8 (Diff revision 2) > +<head> > + <meta charset="utf-8"> > + <title>Test basic autofill</title> > + <script type="text/javascript" src="/tests/SimpleTest/SimpleTest.js"></script> > + <script type="text/javascript" src="/tests/SimpleTest/SpawnTask.js"></script> > + <script type="text/javascript" src="formautofill_common.js"></script> I still think that for now we should reference satchel's "satchel_common.js" as-is and then we can have our own .js file for helpers not covered by the satchel one. I would rather we fork only when we need to since it's not exactly nice code to maintain. Are there specific reasons we should fork now?
Attachment #8821457 -
Flags: review?(MattN+bmo)
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 8•4 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8821457 [details] Bug 1325538 - Add mochitest for form autofill feature. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/100744/#review135142 Thanks… looking good but a few things to change so far ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/formautofill_common.js:1 (Diff revision 3) > +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public > + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this > + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ Since this is a test file you don't need to specify a license and it's Public Domain by default. ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/formautofill_parent_utils.js:49 (Diff revision 3) > +addMessageListener("add-profile", (msg) => { > + ParentUtils.updateProfile("add", "FormAutofill:SaveProfile", msg, "profile-added"); > +}); > + > +addMessageListener("remove-profile", (msg) => { > + ParentUtils.updateProfile("remove", "FormAutofill:Removefile", msg, "profile-removed"); I wonder if these message names should be more unique in case they conflict with other code in the future due to the message manager hierarchies: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Multiprocess_Firefox/Message_Manager/Message_manager_overview Maybe prefix with "FormAutofillTest:"? ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/mochitest.ini:1 (Diff revision 3) > +[DEFAULT] > +skip-if = toolkit == 'android' IIUC You shouldn't need this since we're in the browser/ directory ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/test_basic_autocomplete_form.html:50 (Diff revision 3) > + element.addEventListener("change", function onChange(){ > + element.removeEventListener("change", onChange); Nit: use `once` ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/test_basic_autocomplete_form.html:60 (Diff revision 3) > + element.addEventListener("DOMAutoComplete", function onChange(){ > + element.removeEventListener("DOMAutoComplete", onChange); Nit: use `once` ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/test_basic_autocomplete_form.html:104 (Diff revision 3) > +function* runTests() { > + // Form with history only. > + yield setupFormHistory(); > + > + setupTest("tel", ""); > + doKey("down"); > + yield expectPopup(); Can you please use multiple add_task instead? The test that this is based on is hard to follow and everybody who touches it wants to convert it to add_task so I'd rather we don't propagate that previous bad style. ::: testing/profiles/prefs_general.js:366 (Diff revision 3) > // Enable form autofill feature testing. > +user_pref("browser.formautofill.enabled", true); Hmm… this pref is supposed to default to true for users, right? I'm wondering why have default to false in firefox.js now? It seems like we should change firefox.js to default this to true (like we would ship IIUC) and double-check that we are checking the .experimental pref everywhere necessary.
Attachment #8821457 -
Flags: review?(MattN+bmo)
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment on attachment 8821457 [details] Bug 1325538 - Add mochitest for form autofill feature. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/100744/#review135142 > Hmm… this pref is supposed to default to true for users, right? I'm wondering why have default to false in firefox.js now? It seems like we should change firefox.js to default this to true (like we would ship IIUC) and double-check that we are checking the .experimental pref everywhere necessary. We already had experimental pref checking at bootstrap. Do you think we should postpone the checking to elsewhere?
Comment 11•4 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment on attachment 8821457 [details] Bug 1325538 - Add mochitest for form autofill feature. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/100744/#review135142 > We already had experimental pref checking at bootstrap. Do you think we should postpone the checking to elsewhere? No, that seems fine.
Comment 12•4 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8821457 [details] Bug 1325538 - Add mochitest for form autofill feature. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/100744/#review137084 ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/test_basic_autocomplete_form.html:102 (Diff revision 4) > +function startTest() { > + // Form with history only. > + add_task(function* () { I think add_task can be at the top level and you can remove startTest. ::: browser/extensions/formautofill/test/mochitest/test_basic_autocomplete_form.html:104 (Diff revision 4) > + ]); > +} > + > +function startTest() { > + // Form with history only. > + add_task(function* () { Please give descriptive names to all of the task functions since they are output in logs and useful for debugging.
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Updated•4 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 15•4 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8821457 [details] Bug 1325538 - Add mochitest for form autofill feature. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/100744/#review138670 Thanks
Attachment #8821457 -
Flags: review?(MattN+bmo) → review+
Comment 16•4 years ago
|
||
Pushed by mozilla@noorenberghe.ca: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/6a3f4177a0b2 Add mochitest-plain tests for form autofill. r=MattN
Comment 17•4 years ago
|
||
Pushed with a mochitest browser chrome test fix that showed in the try push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/diff/6a3f4177a0b2/browser/extensions/formautofill/test/browser/browser_privacyPreferences.js
Comment 18•4 years ago
|
||
Pushed by mozilla@noorenberghe.ca: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/a49543e6c114 Follow-up to add a missing formAutofillParent.init. r=bustage
Comment 19•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Pulsebot from comment #18) > Pushed by mozilla@noorenberghe.ca: > https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/a49543e6c114 > Follow-up to add a missing formAutofillParent.init. r=bustage Steve, can you check if this change makes sense? Thanks
Flags: needinfo?(schung)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 20•4 years ago
|
||
It would not affect the result, so I think that change is fine.
Flags: needinfo?(schung)
Comment 21•4 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6a3f4177a0b2 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a49543e6c114
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
status-firefox55:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla55
Updated•4 years ago
|
Flags: qe-verify-
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•