Closed
Bug 1329077
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Revert opening a new window hack for test_animation_performance_warning.html
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Animation, defect, P3)
Core
DOM: Animation
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla55
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox55 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: hiro, Assigned: hiro)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
We change test_animation_performance_warning.html to opening a new window to use requetIdleCallback in the test in bug 1328255. Once requestIdleCallback gets shipped on all channels, we can remove the hack.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Summary: Revert opening a new window hack for test_aniamtion_performance_warning.html → Revert opening a new window hack for test_animation_performance_warning.html
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=eb6158c74c9bf8aba3390f613912409d850d6fa1
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8869700 [details] Bug 1329077 - Drop redundant waitForIdleCallback(). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/141284/#review144958
Attachment #8869700 -
Flags: review?(boris.chiou) → review+
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8869699 [details] Bug 1329077 - Revert the hack that opens a new window to use requestIdleCallback. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/141282/#review144962 Assuming most of code are copied, this looks good to me. ::: dom/animation/test/testcommon.js (Diff revision 1) > - "assert_greater_than_equal", > - "assert_not_exists", > "assert_between_inclusive", > "assert_true", "assert_false", > "assert_class_string", "assert_throws", > "assert_unreached", "assert_regexp_match", > "promise_test", "test"]) { > window[funcName] = opener[funcName].bind(opener); > } > > window.EventWatcher = opener.EventWatcher; > - // Used for requestLongerTimeout. > - window.W3CTest = opener.W3CTest; So we can use these functions directly now, right? It seems that we still use ```assert_not_exists``` and ```requestLongerTimeout```.
Attachment #8869699 -
Flags: review?(boris.chiou) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Chiou [:boris] from comment #5) > Comment on attachment 8869699 [details] > Bug 1329077 - Revert the hack that opens a new window to use > requestIdleCallback. > > https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/141282/#review144962 > > Assuming most of code are copied, this looks good to me. > > ::: dom/animation/test/testcommon.js > (Diff revision 1) > > - "assert_greater_than_equal", > > - "assert_not_exists", > > "assert_between_inclusive", > > "assert_true", "assert_false", > > "assert_class_string", "assert_throws", > > "assert_unreached", "assert_regexp_match", > > "promise_test", "test"]) { > > window[funcName] = opener[funcName].bind(opener); > > } > > > > window.EventWatcher = opener.EventWatcher; > > - // Used for requestLongerTimeout. > > - window.W3CTest = opener.W3CTest; > > So we can use these functions directly now, right? It seems that we still > use ```assert_not_exists``` and ```requestLongerTimeout```. That's right!
Pushed by hikezoe@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/81e7acdb8990 Revert the hack that opens a new window to use requestIdleCallback. r=boris https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/6f7dd28f9060 Drop redundant waitForIdleCallback(). r=boris
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/81e7acdb8990 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6f7dd28f9060
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
status-firefox55:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla55
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → hikezoe
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•