Closed
Bug 1332914
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[GTK] multiple text boxes can be highlighted at the same time
Categories
(Core :: Widget: Gtk, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox51 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox52 | --- | fixed |
| firefox53 | --- | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: ht990332, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: polish, regression, Whiteboard: tpi:+)
Attachments
(1 file)
|
182.97 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
Build ID: 20170122140600
Steps to reproduce:
In firefox 52, linux/gtk3, multiple text boxes can be highlighted at the same time.
Luckily, this is not an issue on firefox 53 but since firefox 52 is going to beta soon, I felt I need to report this.
Notice the attached screenshot.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → Widget: Gtk
Product: Firefox → Core
| Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
OS: Unspecified → Linux
Hardware: Unspecified → x86_64
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
What is the gtk version and theme?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
GTK+ 3.22.7
Default Adwaita theme.
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Thanks. Firefox 52.0b1 and b4 reproduce also with GTK 3.20.6. Seems to
change on hover and click. The way that hover effects change with time
suggests this may be due to animations.
entry has "transition: all 200ms cubic-bezier(0.25, 0.46, 0.45, 0.94);"
With GTK 3.18.9, which also has this transition, I'm not seeing any blue focus
border.
Firefox 51.0b14 shows the focus ring and only as expected, with GTK 3.18 or
3.20.
This was triggered by
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/5d6136e0a045
Perhaps active and hover flags were introduced with GtkEntry like
bug 1328899, but that is having only an indirect effect, perhaps through
triggering style resolution more often. There is something else involved.
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/99c765086bf4 seems to resolve
the symptoms. That may be a candidate for uplift, but I'd like to understand
why that helps before doing that.
Blocks: 1282753
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
status-firefox51:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox52:
--- → affected
status-firefox53:
--- → unaffected
Depends on: 1319957
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: regression
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
If gtk_css_node_get_timestamp() doesn't find a frame clock, then it returns a
special timestamp of 0
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkcssnode.c?h=3.22.8#n695
which avoids animations:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkcssanimatedstyle.c?h=3.22.8#n435
The frameclock lookup is performed on the root CSS node in the node hierarchy:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkcssnode.c?h=3.22.8#n684
In Gecko, the root CSS node currently comes from a widget and so
gtk_widget_get_frame_clock() is used to find the frame clock (if animations
are enabled in the setttings):
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkcsswidgetnode.c?h=3.22.8#n266
Unrealized widgets do not have a frame clock:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkwidget.c?h=3.22.8#n5786
Realizing any widget will realize its parents, and so realization of all
widgets in the hierarchy must be removed to prevent the root widget/node from
having a frame clock, which is what 99c765086bf4 does. Taking only part of
that patch will not avoid this bug.
I'll request uplift of 99c765086bf4 to beta 52 in bug 1319957.
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Hussam, the fix for this should be in Firefox 52b7, which will be made available tomorrow. Can you please verify that it's fixed? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(me)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
It is fixed in in Firefox 52b7. Thank you.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(me)
Resolution: --- → INVALID
| Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Sorry, it won't let me close as fixed.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago → 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•9 years ago
|
Resolution: INVALID → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•