Created attachment 8846210 [details] sample paylod for Plugin Safety Since we are running this iteratively over a 6-week period, we plan to run an ipynb-based analysis to answer a handful of questions (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sYp0DNioPA5iF3iw9LHGf1uN5B5AgdCu7jJxAh0MiqA/edit#heading=h.ki2euufqck3g) which will determine how we should modify our lists week-to-week and provide any details that we might need for assessment of allowed-list determinations or nefarious Flash agents after-the-fact. Said ipynb is still being written (and reviewed by chutten). We are using a custom ping to send this data. Kirk Steuber is creating the ipynb, chutten is reviewing, but as this is primarily data collection and ranking, I assert that chutten will be the primary owner by proxy having reviewed our collection and analysis prior to launch. [I don't know what an analysis plan is, so I don't know how to answer that question, really.] To my knowledge, we require no third-party data collection.
Attachment #8846210 - Flags: review?(rweiss)
(Data now in the proper location: https://github.com/squarewave/shield-study-essential-flash/tree/master/docs)
Not sure why this is assigned to me. Should be either rweiss or merwin, I think.
Assignee: benjamin → rweiss
The "How To Shield Study" doc says to "Assign the bug to the primary sponsor of the study", which according to earlier in the doc is you. Please redirect all as necessary if that's not correct (I see that doc is changing somewhat).
The doc you've provided covers your analysis plan for Shield studies. Signing off for data review.
Attachment #8846210 - Flags: review?(rweiss) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 7 months ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.