Closed
Bug 1350682
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Crash in mozalloc_abort | NS_DebugBreak | mozilla::ipc::LogicError | mozilla::layers::PVideoBridge::Transition
Categories
(Core :: WebVR, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla55
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox52 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr52 | --- | unaffected |
firefox53 | --- | unaffected |
firefox54 | --- | unaffected |
firefox55 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: calixte, Assigned: daoshengmu)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, Whiteboard: [clouseau])
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file)
This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is report bp-31ad1de6-652d-4cc5-a347-886332170326. ============================================================= There are 2 crashes in nightly 55 with buildid 20170325030203. In analyzing the backtrace, the regression may have been introduced by patch [1] to fix bug 1299937. [1] https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev?node=5d8e162ef5f73106037a6ad5c34770f26ab86447
Flags: needinfo?(dmu)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
I think it would be something wrong from the IPDL build tool, we can try the clobber build and see what's happened next. Ideally, PVRManagerChild::SendStopVibrateHaptic should be "PVRManager::Transition(PVRManager::Msg_StopVibrateHaptic__ID, (&(mState)));" I will keep following this bug if it can be reproduced again.
Flags: needinfo?(dmu)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
There are 2 new crashes with signature "mozalloc_abort | NS_DebugBreak | mozilla::ipc::LogicError | mozilla::gfx::PVsyncBridge::Transition".
Crash Signature: [@ mozalloc_abort | NS_DebugBreak | mozilla::ipc::LogicError | mozilla::layers::PVideoBridge::Transition] → [@ mozalloc_abort | NS_DebugBreak | mozilla::ipc::LogicError | mozilla::layers::PVideoBridge::Transition]
[@ mozalloc_abort | NS_DebugBreak | mozilla::ipc::LogicError | mozilla::gfx::PVsyncBridge::Transition ]
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
It seems to be the actor of VRManagerChild has been deleted at somewhere. After some investigation, I don't find anything that is related to PVRManagerParent::Send__delete__(). I would like to add an assertion to help me determine whether it is because mVRChannelChild is deleted already. Btw, I still think using a raw pointer for VRManagerChild is better than a RefPtr. If the root cause is the actor is deleted, we should just need to check IsDeleted().
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8851891 [details] Bug 1350682 - Call VRManagerChild getter when need it at GamepadManager instead of keeping it; https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/124124/#review126702 LGTM
Attachment #8851891 -
Flags: review?(cleu) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Daosheng Mu[:daoshengmu] from comment #5) > Comment on attachment 8851891 [details] > Bug 1350682 - Call VRManagerChild getter when need it at GamepadManager > instead of keeping it; > > Review request updated; see interdiff: > https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/124124/diff/1-2/ I think it is pretty much like the original mVRManagerChild has been deleted when the sVRManagerChildSingleton is assigned by a new one. Therefore, using VRManagerChild::Get() is more correct.
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dmu
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8851891 [details] Bug 1350682 - Call VRManagerChild getter when need it at GamepadManager instead of keeping it; https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/124124/#review127192 This LGTM, Thanks!
Attachment #8851891 -
Flags: review?(kgilbert) → review+
Pushed by dmu@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/ba032e6ed34b Call VRManagerChild getter when need it at GamepadManager instead of keeping it; r=kip,Lenzak
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ba032e6ed34b
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla55
Updated•7 years ago
|
status-firefox52:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox53:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox54:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr52:
--- → unaffected
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•