Closed
Bug 1358561
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Test taskcluster on Windows 10 on HP blades
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations :: RelOps: General, task)
Infrastructure & Operations
RelOps: General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: markco, Assigned: markco)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
No description provided.
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: relops → mcornmesser
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Summary: Test Windows 10 testing on HP blades → Test taskcluster on Windows 10 on HP blades
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8864896 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen)
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8864896 [details] [review] Additional OCC datacenter support comments in the pr
Attachment #8864896 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
My bad. This is a much cleaner PR.
Attachment #8864896 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8865523 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen)
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8865523 [details] [review] Additional OCC datacenter support merged: https://github.com/mozilla-releng/OpenCloudConfig/commit/e32af96140047b947f363bee3828bf5373fde0c3
Attachment #8865523 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
Windows 10 x64 VM opt from https://hg.mozilla.org/try/rev/d8e826196c8f0a7bcd1278c608cde0124c30de79 1. FAIL test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-xperf-e10s WxvBzJTcSaW2zcZGPZsE6Q https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#WxvBzJTcSaW2zcZGPZsE6Q/0 INFO - u'"c:/Program Files/Microsoft Windows Performance Toolkit/xperf.exe"'], 03:30:58 INFO - ERROR: xperf.exe cannot be found at the path specified I will need to look into and figure out which SDK installs the xperf.exe to this location or alternatively sym link the existing xperf.exe to this location. 2. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-tp5o-e10s OCwpozBqQZqIf_eUCnHDTg https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#OCwpozBqQZqIf_eUCnHDTg/0 3. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-svgr-e10s YZv_3gRnS9urayAkG9TzDQ https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#YZv_3gRnS9urayAkG9TzDQ/0 4. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-quantum-pageload-e10s V123WS2WQyi3q8_W8rrmUw https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#V123WS2WQyi3q8_W8rrmUw/0 5. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-perf-reftest-e10s AtH3VxJWTDyYKfUFEyUkSQ https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#AtH3VxJWTDyYKfUFEyUkSQ/0 6. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-other-e10s a5IB2eolQiOXmHgoiDDHrg https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#a5IB2eolQiOXmHgoiDDHrg/0 7. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-g5-e10s dO7JBK3FTUSS1Q2fw4tEcA https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#dO7JBK3FTUSS1Q2fw4tEcA/0 8. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-g4-e10s e3h2sDAiTFqqvb-gBpVQyA https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#e3h2sDAiTFqqvb-gBpVQyA/0 9. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-g2-e10s D_3g8D1pSTyfg36OgEarCQ https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#D_3g8D1pSTyfg36OgEarCQ/0 10. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-g1-e10s c9lUJ7roRseGXbKRMjroGQ https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#c9lUJ7roRseGXbKRMjroGQ/0 11. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-dromaeojs-e10s UYwyMjWQQUyu6qR3Cb2uaA https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#UYwyMjWQQUyu6qR3Cb2uaA/0 12. PASS test-windows10-64-vm/opt-talos-chrome-e10s cMnvfdQeRpO1gjwvMXd1Uw https://tools.taskcluster.net/task-inspector/#cMnvfdQeRpO1gjwvMXd1Uw/0 jmaher: Could you take a look and see if anything concerning with the passing test?
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
jmaher: Also is does this cover all the Talos test?
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
I took a look over all the passing logs- they are producing real data which seems to follow similar patterns and there are no errors that seem unique to this environment :) I also confirmed that this is the full set of jobs. As for the xperf failures, we currently don't run xperf on win10, only on win7- I think there is some additional development work to make that job pass. We should figure that out, I believe the toolchain is different for win10 than win7.
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
Small changes for datacenter workers. The NTP server bit willneed to be improved once we know more about MDC2. If r+ please merge.
Attachment #8918170 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen)
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8918170 [details] [review] Additional support for WIn 10 datacneter workers lgtm, just needs the two comments in the gh review addressed
Attachment #8918170 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
This is functioning and QA now has a test pool.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•