Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push bcffb170c5718c54d7a18842a082437831b20de5. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 3% tsvgr_opacity summary osx-10-10 opt 419.92 -> 431.23 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=6473 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Running *** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! *** Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
I see two relevant changesets for this patch. Could you take a look and confirm this regression?
The autoland code from Servo isn't even compiled, so it can't be that. I'm very skeptical that building files in unified mode would have resulted in a regression, too.
There is a 2 hour gap, during which the regression appeared. I will look over changesets uploaded in that interval. Thank you, :froydnj, for the quick notice.
this looks like bug 1363102 instead: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=6c9c06059b386f7c879a4926c051783472ec7ce4&tochange=5bcdf4e6459b6c7207924dc666075769839705aa here is the graph: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/graphs?series=%5Bmozilla-inbound,cf66eebbefd68c20ae85ba4218e71aa6746fb863,1,1%5D&zoom=1494232528059.8706,1494292510100.3237,398.12734368142117,445.8801526701852 I see that a bit later the data comes back down, it seems to be noisier. Possibly this is some random noise in the system, not a real regression, lets see if :baku has any ideas before writing this off. :baku, do you see anything in your patch that could cause a svg talos regression?
It seems noise, that patch adds an error check in Location::ToString(). Nothing related with SVG.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 8 months ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.