Closed
Bug 136797
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Don't require default regexp when creating administrator account.
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Installation & Upgrading, enhancement, P5)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: CodeMachine, Unassigned)
References
Details
We currently require the administrator account created in checksetup.pl to satisfy emailregexp, and give an error if it doesn't. However, it's unlikely the administrator has had an opportunity to change the params at this point, since there is no administrator account. Hence, to make this useful for people with non-default emailregexps, I suggest if params does not exist yet we give a warning in this situation. If they proceed we should write out .* and the emailregexp.
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
These unloved bugs have been sitting untouched since June 2002 or longer. If nobody does anything else to them, they certainly won't make 2.18 Retargetting to 2.20. If you really plan to push them right now, you might pull them back in.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.18 → Bugzilla 2.20
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has not been touched by its owner in over six months, even though it is targeted to 2.20, for which the freeze is 10 days away. Unsetting the target milestone, on the assumption that nobody is actually working on it or has any plans to soon. If you are the owner, and you plan to work on the bug, please give it a real target milestone. If you are the owner, and you do *not* plan to work on it, please reassign it to nobody@bugzilla.org or a .bugs component owner. If you are *anybody*, and you get this comment, and *you* plan to work on the bug, please reassign it to yourself if you have the ability.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.20 → ---
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: mattyt-bugzilla → default-qa
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: zach → installation
Severity: normal → enhancement
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Max, is this bug still valid?
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Well, it's still *true*. We use User->create to make an admin. However, I see nothing wrong with requiring his username to be an email address by default. He can change it after he logs in--that's not too hard.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → P5
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Bug 218917, which splits email addresses and login names (and makes checksetup prompt for both), will effectively fix this. There is no equivalent of emailregexp for login names (although some chars are banned always). So the admin will always be able to log in. Gerv
Depends on: 218917
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
So this is wontfix in favor of bug 218917.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•