1372944 - latest-mozilla-beta-l10n/ be Firefox Developer Edition instead of Beta now

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

Description

[YF (Yang)]

STR:
e.g. https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-beta-l10n/firefox-55.0.zh-CN.win32.installer.exe


Actual results:
The installer icon is a new icon and equal to https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/55.0b1/win32/zh-CN/Firefox%20Setup%2055.0b1.exe, but the installer is Firefox Developer Edition.

Comment 1

[Jeremy Orem [:oremj]]

Rail, is this a releng bug?

Comment 2

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Yes, this is us.

Comment 3

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

I wonder if we should stop publishing there completely...

Comment 4

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Callek, do you know what publishes there? There are https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-release-l10n/ https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-beta-l10n/, but not https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-release/ nor https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-beta/. Sounds like we should tweak the l10n repack script so it doesn't publish to "latest". Maybe make https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/mozharness/configs/single_locale/production.py#10 per branch?

Comment 5

[Justin Wood (:Callek)]

(In reply to Rail Aliiev [:rail] ⌚️ET from comment #4)
> Callek, do you know what publishes there? There are
> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-release-l10n/
> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-beta-l10n/,
> but not
> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-release/ nor
> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-beta/. Sounds
> like we should tweak the l10n repack script so it doesn't publish to
> "latest". Maybe make
> https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/mozharness/configs/
> single_locale/production.py#10 per branch?

...I'm not sure offhand, maybe make `stage_product` appropriate for devedition l10n?

Comment 6

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

I don't think beta/release builds should be publishing to the "latest" directories. It looks like we stopped doing that in the 59 beta cycle.

Comment 7

[Mihai Tabara [:mtabara]⌚️GMT]

We haven't seen entries such as these for a good while now, I think we're good to close this bug.
Feel free to re-open if I'm wrong.