Closed
Bug 1376050
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Date of birth field on orbitz.com travelers section doesn't accept valid input in Nightly
Categories
(Web Compatibility :: Site Reports, defect, P3)
Tracking
(firefox54 unaffected, firefox55 disabled, firefox56+ wontfix, firefox57+ wontfix, firefox58 affected)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: cmore, Assigned: karlcow)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [sitewait])
Attachments
(2 files)
Steps to reproduce:
1) Create an account on orbitz.com
2) Go to: https://www.orbitz.com/user/account
3) Click "other travelers"
4) Make up a name and try to enter a date into the birth date field.
5) Click save at the bottom.
Expected results:
Travler saved
Actual results:
Error saying "invalid date or format".
It is difficult to use the date picker to start let alone submit the form. No matter if I put in a valid date or not, I get the invalid date format error.
It works perfectly fine in Firefox 54.0 release or Chrome, but not in Fx 56.01a. When I got this error, I had to use another browser to book a flight.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Jessica, this sounds like it might be a regression caused by us implementing input type=date, can you investigate / forward to someone who can?
Component: General → Untriaged
Flags: needinfo?(jjong)
Keywords: regression,
regressionwindow-wanted
Product: Firefox → Core
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: Break web page
Regression window (with dom.forms.datetime;true):
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?fromchange=3e6775cee4f7098f4d11bdd452c276a56ac1f29a&tochange=feaeb4c4a1149a7925e9d0e32a61fde7ad74b8f2
Regressed by Bug 1346085
Blocks: 1346085
status-firefox54:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox55:
--- → disabled
status-firefox56:
--- → affected
tracking-firefox56:
--- → ?
Component: Untriaged → Layout: Form Controls
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
Version: unspecified → 55 Branch
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
From the network monitor, I see the same form data sent to the server from Chrome and from Firefox Nightly, that is, for example:
{"first_name":"nj","middle_name":"","last_name":"kk","dob":"2017-06-01","primaryCountryCode":"1","phone_number":"","altCountryCode":"1","alt_phone_number":"","emergencyContactFirstName":"","emergencyContactLastName":"","engcyCountryCode":"1","emergencyContactPhoneNumber":"","alpha3PrimaryCountryCode":"usa","alpha3AltCountryCode":"usa","alpha3EngcyCountryCode":"usa"}
I wonder if the server is doing anything special when the UA is Firefox/Gecko, since I used "Edit and Resend" to change the UA part and then everything worked fine.
Is there a way to confirm this?
Flags: needinfo?(jjong)
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jessica Jong [:jessica] from comment #5)
> From the network monitor, I see the same form data sent to the server from
> Chrome and from Firefox Nightly, that is, for example:
>
> {"first_name":"nj","middle_name":"","last_name":"kk","dob":"2017-06-01",
> "primaryCountryCode":"1","phone_number":"","altCountryCode":"1",
> "alt_phone_number":"","emergencyContactFirstName":"",
> "emergencyContactLastName":"","engcyCountryCode":"1",
> "emergencyContactPhoneNumber":"","alpha3PrimaryCountryCode":"usa",
> "alpha3AltCountryCode":"usa","alpha3EngcyCountryCode":"usa"}
>
> I wonder if the server is doing anything special when the UA is
> Firefox/Gecko, since I used "Edit and Resend" to change the UA part and then
> everything worked fine.
>
> Is there a way to confirm this?
I can confirm that UA spoofing fixis the problem, I.e., Setting "general.useragent.override" to "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/59.0.3071.104 Safari/537.36" also fix the problem.
So, it seems the site are doing different processing for each UA, and this is the site problem.
Tech evangelism?
Keywords: regression
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Karl, is this something you could help with? Do you know if we have contacts at Orbitz?
Component: Layout: Form Controls → Desktop
Flags: needinfo?(kdubost)
Product: Core → Tech Evangelism
Version: 55 Branch → Firefox 55
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
POST /users/189237532/addassociated HTTP/1.1
Host: www.orbitz.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/56.0
Accept: application/json, text/javascript, */*; q=0.01
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br
Referer: https://www.orbitz.com/user/account
Content-Type: application/json
X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest
Content-Length: 370
Cookie: *** long cookie string ***
Connection: keep-alive
{"first_name":"Foo","middle_name":"","last_name":"Bar","dob":"2017-06-06","primaryCountryCode":"1","phone_number":"","altCountryCode":"1","alt_phone_number":"","emergencyContactFirstName":"","emergencyContactLastName":"","engcyCountryCode":"1","emergencyContactPhoneNumber":"","alpha3PrimaryCountryCode":"usa","alpha3AltCountryCode":"usa","alpha3EngcyCountryCode":"usa"}
{
"exception": "Unable to parse date of birthjava.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: \"2017-06-06\"",
"success": "0",
"omnitureData": "{\"accountName\":\"10207aidepxe\",\"omnitureProperties\":{\"charSet\":\"UTF-8\",\"eVar56\":\"notRewardsMember\",\"server\":\"www.orbitz.com\",\"eVar55\":\"authenticated | full | EMAIL\",\"eVar54\":\"1033\",\"eVar18\":\"D\\u003dpageName\",\"eVar17\":\"D\\u003dpageName\",\"pageName\":\"page.Account.MyAccount\",\"list1\":\"11918.1|12520.0|99991.0\",\"activityId\":\"3a863a4e-00e0-4a0a-88e9-70a79ff32dce\",\"prop30\":\"1033\",\"prop11\":\"189237532\",\"prop10\":\"3a863a4e-00e0-4a0a-88e9-70a79ff32dce\",\"userType\":\"AUTHENTICATED\",\"prop13\":\"201442670\",\"prop12\":\"d65a0c18-f061-4d88-82e8-ec94480411d3\",\"eVar40\":\"NoPartnerTier\",\"prop14\":\"9a9e0042c34e72b4d3a49cce866c194139f11ca357003817d245a2fde885824d\"}}",
"errorCode": "INVALID_DATE",
"id": 189237532,
"email": "mozwebqa@****.***"
}
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
so at least we know that their issue is happening at
"exception": "Unable to parse date of birthjava.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: \"2017-06-06\"",
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
I had a contact 4 years ago. I can try again.
Oh but wait… We are not sending the same thing than Safari.
* Safari/Chrome "dob": "11/10/1985",
* Firefox "dob": "2017-06-06",
So maybe there is something else before. We need to handle ;)
What the browser sent (Firefox) HTTP POST data:
{
"first_name": "Foo",
"middle_name": "",
"last_name": "Bar",
"dob": "2017-06-06",
"primaryCountryCode": "1",
"phone_number": "",
"altCountryCode": "1",
"alt_phone_number": "",
"emergencyContactFirstName": "",
"emergencyContactLastName": "",
"engcyCountryCode": "1",
"emergencyContactPhoneNumber": "",
"alpha3PrimaryCountryCode": "usa",
"alpha3AltCountryCode": "usa",
"alpha3EngcyCountryCode": "usa"
}
What the browser sent (Safari) HTTP POST data:
{
"first_name": "foo",
"middle_name": "",
"last_name": "bar",
"dob": "11/10/1985",
"primaryCountryCode": "1",
"phone_number": "",
"altCountryCode": "1",
"alt_phone_number": "",
"emergencyContactFirstName": "",
"emergencyContactLastName": "",
"engcyCountryCode": "1",
"emergencyContactPhoneNumber": "",
"alpha3PrimaryCountryCode": "usa",
"alpha3AltCountryCode": "usa",
"alpha3EngcyCountryCode": "usa"
}
When it's working the browser receives (Safari):
{
"success": "1",
"omnitureData": "{\"accountName\":\"10207aidepxe\",\"omnitureProperties\":{\"charSet\":\"UTF-8\",\"eVar56\":\"notRewardsMember\",\"server\":\"www.orbitz.com\",\"eVar55\":\"authenticated | full | EMAIL\",\"eVar54\":\"1033\",\"eVar18\":\"D\\u003dpageName\",\"eVar17\":\"D\\u003dpageName\",\"eVar28\":\"Account.Traveler.Add.Success\",\"pageName\":\"page.Account.AssociatedTravelers\",\"list1\":\"99991.0|11918.1|99991.0\",\"activityId\":\"49ca053d-eb7a-4b01-8dc0-7adaaa8f165d\",\"prop16\":\"Account.Traveler.Add.Success\",\"prop30\":\"1033\",\"prop11\":\"189237532\",\"prop10\":\"49ca053d-eb7a-4b01-8dc0-7adaaa8f165d\",\"userType\":\"AUTHENTICATED\",\"prop13\":\"201442670\",\"prop12\":\"30ca6335-d82e-47fd-9515-f5fa265aa9f0\",\"eVar40\":\"NoPartnerTier\",\"events\":\"event27\",\"prop14\":\"9a9e0042c34e72b4d3a49cce866c194139f11ca357003817d245a2fde885824d\"}}",
"id": 189237532,
"email": "mozwebqa@*******"
}
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•7 years ago
|
||
The markup associated.
<input id="assoDOB" name="dob" placeholder="mm/dd/yyyy" typebuffer="" type="date">
I also noticed that in nightly devtools. it display an empty event. Opening a bug for this.
Comment 12•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Karl Dubost :karlcow from comment #10)
> I had a contact 4 years ago. I can try again.
>
>
> Oh but wait… We are not sending the same thing than Safari.
>
> * Safari/Chrome "dob": "11/10/1985",
> * Firefox "dob": "2017-06-06",
>
Safari doesn't support <input type=date>, so it's shown as a regular textbox with placeholder "mm/dd/yyyy". I think the server might be expecting the format "mm/dd/yyyy" from Firefox too, because we didn't support <input type=date>, until now. Now, we send the date in the same format as Chrome, that is, "yyyy-mm-dd", which is defined in the spec.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•7 years ago
|
||
In Opera (Blink),
{
"alpha3AltCountryCode": "usa",
"alpha3EngcyCountryCode": "usa",
"alpha3PrimaryCountryCode": "usa",
"altCountryCode": "1",
"alt_phone_number": "",
"dob": "2015-06-17",
"emergencyContactFirstName": "",
"emergencyContactLastName": "",
"emergencyContactPhoneNumber": "",
"engcyCountryCode": "1",
"first_name": "foo ",
"last_name": "bar",
"middle_name": "bar",
"phone_number": "",
"primaryCountryCode": "1"
}
so indeed server side user agent sniffing. I guess the best solution for them is to avoid server side UA sniffing and accept the two formats.
I tried to renew an old contact, but the person left.
orbitz is part of expedia. I will dig for a contact.
Thanks.
Assignee: nobody → kdubost
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•7 years ago
|
||
There are two github repos for Expedia
@ExpediaDotCom and @ExpediaInc
and Orbitz has on GitHub
@OrbitzWorldwide
Let's try with https://github.com/neuroshock
Contacted today
Flags: needinfo?(kdubost)
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [needscontact] → [sitewait]
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•7 years ago
|
||
Trying another contact.
David Strugnell at Expedia.
https://twitter.com/struggyone
https://github.com/struggyone
Comment 18•7 years ago
|
||
I tried writing to a couple of people through LinkedIn contacts.
Do we know it's still broken in 56/57?
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (needinfo? me) from comment #18)
> I tried writing to a couple of people through LinkedIn contacts.
> Do we know it's still broken in 56/57?
I just tested it in the latest nightly 57 and still doesn't work. I can now save the initial form, but it doesn't save anything and when I edit it and try to use the date picker, I get the same error as comment 0. So, in this case, I would have to use Chrome if this happened.
Comment 20•7 years ago
|
||
Mark 56 won't fix as we are only 1 week from RC.
Comment 21•7 years ago
|
||
Adam, do you think you might be able to find some contacts via LinkedIn for this one?
Flags: needinfo?(astevenson)
Comment 22•7 years ago
|
||
Sure, reaching out to Kevin Bess https://www.linkedin.com/in/krbess/.
Flags: needinfo?(astevenson)
Comment 23•7 years ago
|
||
Doesn't look like they are answering, marking this fix-optional for 57.
I messaged another possible contact from Orbitz with a link to this bug.
status-firefox58:
--- → affected
Comment 24•7 years ago
|
||
I also reported the issue as "feedback" on both Expedia and Orbitz support sites with a link to the bug and a request that the feedback be passed on to a web dev or engineering team.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Comment 25•6 years ago
|
||
I've created and account and signed in.
The layout seems to have changed, there is no "Date Picker" anymore, birth date can be manually added (by maintaining the format mm/dd/yyyy). Any valid date is accepted and stored in "Personal Info" section.
Note: there is no validation for invalid dates (e.g born in a future date).
Tested with:
Browser / Version: Firefox Nightly 61.0a1 (2018-04-19)
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro
Can you still reproduce it?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(chrismore.bugzilla)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 26•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Oana Arbuzov [:oanaarbuzov] from comment #25)
> I've created and account and signed in.
>
> The layout seems to have changed, there is no "Date Picker" anymore, birth
> date can be manually added (by maintaining the format mm/dd/yyyy). Any valid
> date is accepted and stored in "Personal Info" section.
>
> Note: there is no validation for invalid dates (e.g born in a future date).
>
> Tested with:
> Browser / Version: Firefox Nightly 61.0a1 (2018-04-19)
> Operating System: Windows 10 Pro
>
> Can you still reproduce it?
I just tested it Fx59 release with my original instructions and all is fine now. No errors.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: needinfo?(chrismore.bugzilla)
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Web Compatibility
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•