Closed
Bug 1380268
Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Let the new search textbox styling graduate from in-content/common.inc.css to textbox.css
Categories
(Toolkit :: Themes, defect, P1)
Toolkit
Themes
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: dao, Assigned: dao)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [photon-visual][p2])
Attachments
(1 file)
With bug 1378330 fixed, I think this is now ready to be used for all search textboxes.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
| Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Flags: qe-verify+
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Updated•4 years ago
|
Iteration: --- → 56.3 - Jul 24
QA Contact: brindusa.tot
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8885633 [details] Bug 1380268 - Let the new search textbox styling graduate from in-content/common.inc.css to textbox.css. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/156488/#review162708
Attachment #8885633 -
Flags: review?(nhnt11) → review+
Pushed by dgottwald@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/dd4e52e83896 Let the new search textbox styling graduate from in-content/common.inc.css to textbox.css. r=nhnt11
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
Hmm, this will probably bounce. I forgot to update browser/themes/windows/syncedtabs/sidebar.css (it uses Search-glass.png).
Indeed. Backed out: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/402045639196a2ed415b42b616cf2c1170005abc Push with failures: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=autoland&revision=dd4e52e83896d64b66adc8a303a2b49cec93d880&filter-resultStatus=testfailed&filter-resultStatus=busted&filter-resultStatus=exception&filter-resultStatus=retry&filter-resultStatus=usercancel&filter-resultStatus=runnable
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Pushed by dgottwald@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/bccbac6fcf20 Let the new search textbox styling graduate from in-content/common.inc.css to textbox.css. r=nhnt11
Comment 8•4 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bccbac6fcf20
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
status-firefox56:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla56
| Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Comment 9•4 years ago
|
||
Hi Nihanth, Can you please advise me how to verify this issue? Thanks
Flags: needinfo?(nhnt11)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to ovidiu boca[:Ovidiu] from comment #9) > Hi Nihanth, > > Can you please advise me how to verify this issue? Thanks Check that our various search textboxes look consistent across platforms (including High Contrast mode on Windows). Search textboxes to check: - History and bookmarks sidebars - about:preferences - about:config - about:addons
Flags: needinfo?(nhnt11)
Comment 11•4 years ago
|
||
Thanks Dão for your suggestions. I tested on Mac OS X 10.12 Windows 10 and Ubuntu 16.04 with Nightly 57.0a1(2017-08-08) and the various search text boxes look consistent except 2 cases: On Ubuntu 16.04 the border line from search field from bookmarks or history sidebars has an orange color(like the one from URL bar or search bar), the border line from search field from about:preferences, about:config, about:addons, has a blue color. Also On Win 10 with High Contrast mode, there is a difference between border line color (search text boxes) from history or bookmarks sidebars and about pages. This is intended?
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to ovidiu boca[:Ovidiu] from comment #11) > On Ubuntu 16.04 the border line from search field from bookmarks or history > sidebars has an orange color(like the one from URL bar or search bar), the > border line from search field from about:preferences, about:config, > about:addons, has a blue color. > > Also On Win 10 with High Contrast mode, there is a difference between border > line color (search text boxes) from history or bookmarks sidebars and about > pages. This is an unfortunate inconsistency but expected for the time being.
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Comment 13•4 years ago
|
||
Thanks Dão, Based on comment 11 and comment 12, I will mark this as a verified fix.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•