Closed
Bug 1381588
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Data migration/archival plan for MozReview
Categories
(MozReview Graveyard :: General, enhancement)
MozReview Graveyard
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mcote, Assigned: mars)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
Before completely decommissioning MozReview, we need to migrate the data somewhere. So far we have two broad ideas: * Upload patches to S3 and update attachment links to point there. * Upload patches to Bugzilla directly. In both cases we'd also want to update links in review comments.
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Côté [:mcote] from comment #0) > Before completely decommissioning MozReview, we need to migrate the data > somewhere. So far we have two broad ideas: > > * Upload patches to S3 and update attachment links to point there. > * Upload patches to Bugzilla directly. All of the patches should already be in the review repository, it could just be made readonly?
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Can we load every review request URL in a browser, take a snapshot of the finalized HTML, possibly remove references to JS, and upload a static HTML snapshot to S3? That way we'd get the full site content and layout without having to run a dynamic server. That's a bit of complexity. But it avoids having to re-normalize the data to Bugzilla. Pick your poison.
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → mars
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
See the project planning doc linked in the URL field for planning details.
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
One of the current capabilities of MozReview is that you can pull the patches in a review request (including a historical one) into your local repository. This is possible because behind the scenes, MozReview knows all the ancestors of the patches submitted for review, including the ones that are not part of the review request. Will this ability be preserved by the archival process?
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
We are still working out proposals. Final decision on a process is a little ways off.
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8959699 [details] Add a MozReview-to-Phabricator migration guide Mark Côté [:mcote] has approved the revision. https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D744
Attachment #8959699 -
Flags: review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
This was announced last week (and the plan slightly amended afterward): https://groups.google.com/forum/?pli=1#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/Bxomd5VAgKU
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•