Investigate differences between bsmedberg/daily-latency-metrics, error_aggregates, and quantum_rc

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

Data Platform and Tools
Datasets: General
P1
normal
RESOLVED FIXED
11 months ago
9 months ago

People

(Reporter: frank, Assigned: frank)

Tracking

Details

These differences need to be explained, and we need consensus on which values are "correct".

Comment 1

11 months ago
Just adding a data point here, I checked data from yesterday (usage_hours, number of pings processed, main and content crashes) on both crash_aggregates and error_aggregates and the numbers seems to be in the same ballpark.
(Assignee)

Comment 2

11 months ago
I've noted a few differences between bsmedberg's script and error_aggregates:
1. bsmedberg limits to just Windows_NT clients, while error_aggregates has os_name as a dimension
2. bsmedberg limits to clients with e10sEnabled, while error_aggregates has quantum_ready, which indicates the client has e10sEnabled. (Note that quantum_ready = newstyle theme, no addons [i.e. they are system or webextensions only], and e10sEnabled)

These differences do not explain all of the count differences between the two scripts, but only for the beginning of the period [0].

[0] https://screenshots.firefox.com/ubwoHr0Mu7QruIl2/localhost
(Assignee)

Updated

9 months ago
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 9 months ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.