Closed
Bug 1395496
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
MDN: WebExt vs Privileged APIs needs review and update
Categories
(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: Add-ons, enhancement)
Developer Documentation Graveyard
Add-ons
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: fb+mozdev, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
I had a look at the history of the MDN page for Comparing with XUL/XPCOM Extensions and it looks like that at least the section about privileged APIs [0] needs a review and possibly updates. Since Fx 57 removes support for legacy extensions, it'd much appreciated if the WebExt team would have a quick look ASAP at the list on the MDN page and extend it so extension developers can figure out what works and what doesn't work with WebExt *based on the most recent developments*. There has already been some very nasty backlash due to the architecture changes, so let's make sure we can show some arguments for what WebExts can (still) do right now / in Fx 57. [0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Comparison_with_XUL_XPCOM_extensions#Privileged_APIs
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: WebExtensions: Untriaged → Add-ons
Product: Toolkit → Developer Documentation
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
MDN Web Docs' bug reporting has now moved to GitHub. From now on, please file content bugs at https://github.com/mdn/sprints/issues/ and platform bugs at https://github.com/mdn/kuma/issues/.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•