Closed
Bug 1398206
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Please disable LDAP access for mfilip@mozilla.com
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations :: Infrastructure: LDAP, task)
Infrastructure & Operations
Infrastructure: LDAP
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: coop, Unassigned)
Details
Monica is one of the sheriffing contractor team leads from SoftVision, but she'll be out on maternity leave for a while (months), so we might as well disable her LDAP access until she returns. Sheriff accounts have elevated access which is why I want to be cautious here.
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
I would suggest that we just remove the sheriff access, and any other privileged group memberships, rather than disabling the account. If we disable the account, it will cause e-mail for her to bounce, among other things and will be quite a manual process to undo later. Let me know how you'd like to proceed.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Justin Dow [:jabba] from comment #1)
> I would suggest that we just remove the sheriff access, and any other
> privileged group memberships, rather than disabling the account. If we
> disable the account, it will cause e-mail for her to bounce, among other
> things and will be quite a manual process to undo later. Let me know how
> you'd like to proceed.
I'm fine with just stripping the access bits as you suggest.
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
The user is not currently in vpn_sheriff or any other groups that the most basic unprivileged employee would be in, except for scm_level_1. Should I remove scm_level_1?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Justin Dow [:jabba] from comment #3)
> The user is not currently in vpn_sheriff or any other groups that the most
> basic unprivileged employee would be in, except for scm_level_1. Should I
> remove scm_level_1?
Hrmmm, I guess maybe she was already on mat leave when that request went through.
We can leave scm_level_1. That's low impact.
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•