Closed
Bug 1401886
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
2.03 - 5.05% damp (linux64, osx-10-10, windows10-64, windows7-32) regression on push 2fb9198e5a1d (Wed Sep 20 2017)
Categories
(DevTools :: General, defect)
DevTools
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: igoldan, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression, talos-regression)
Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?fromchange=1bd12fd8c15ec2cf6959967be015f5eb080e4ecd&tochange=2fb9198e5a1dd2f007d342386f049f584650bc28 As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 5% damp summary osx-10-10 opt e10s 280.51 -> 294.68 5% damp summary windows7-32 pgo e10s 219.38 -> 230.34 3% damp summary windows10-64 opt e10s 263.41 -> 270.25 2% damp summary linux64 opt e10s 252.12 -> 258.20 2% damp summary windows7-32 opt e10s 281.45 -> 287.16 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=9576 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Running *** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! *** Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
Reporter | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → Developer Tools
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Alexandre, should these be the new baselines for the DAMP test? If there's nothing fishing with these results, I would resolve this as WONTFIX.
Flags: needinfo?(poirot.alex)
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the report. Yes this is the new baselines. There is nothing wrong if you look at subtests: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/comparesubtest?originalProject=autoland&originalRevision=905ddac6491cca547135660ad0abdc75380002b4&newProject=autoland&newRevision=969ff8612b148e51b3cafaa369859ca2ffbb8425&originalSignature=1f8aed46624975327d00a6b936cee2c09768ef5d&newSignature=1f8aed46624975327d00a6b936cee2c09768ef5d&framework=1 But I introduced a new subtest "damp cold.inspector.open.DAMP" which bumps the summary number. FYI, you may see more activity around DAMP results as a consequence of bug 1397751. Do not hesitate to ping me if that introduces any issue for you.
Flags: needinfo?(poirot.alex)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandre Poirot [:ochameau] from comment #2) > FYI, you may see more activity around DAMP results as a consequence of bug > 1397751. > Do not hesitate to ping me if that introduces any issue for you. Thanks for the heads up.
Reporter | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Firefox → DevTools
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•