Closed
Bug 1406613
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Loading doesn't finish on www.jalan.net reservation page intermittently on 57 beta
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1401538
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr52 | --- | unaffected |
firefox56 | --- | unaffected |
firefox57 | --- | fixed |
firefox58 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: arai, Assigned: mayhemer)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
8.98 MB,
application/zip
|
Details |
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open Firefox Quantum 57.0b6 (64-bit) with clean profile on macOS
2. Open the following URL
http://www.jalan.net/uw/uwp3200/uww3201init.do?screenId=UWW3201&planListNumPlan=14_0_1&yadNo=353632&roomTypeCd=0185752&rootCd=04&callbackHistFlg=1&smlCd=011702&planCd=01265923&distCd=01&stayYearBkup=2017&stayMonthBkup=10&stayDayBkup=15&stayCountBkup=1&roomCountBkup=1&adultNumBkup=2&browserBack=1&roomCrack=200000&roomCrackBkup=200000&stayYear=2017&stayMonth=10&stayDay=15&stayCount=1&roomCount=1&adultNum=2#price_cal
3. Click "予約へ進む" (means go to reservation) button
if the URL gets invalidated, here's the another steps from the top page:
1. open http://www.jalan.net/
2. click "北海道" in "地図から探す"
3. click "稚内・留萌" in the map
4. click a plan listed under "宿泊プラン"
5. click "予約へ進む"
(I cannot find the equivalent page on english site)
Actual result:
the page itself is loaded, but sometimes the loading doesn't finish
* throbber (a dot moving left and right) keeps moving
* status bar shows "Transferring data from tk.iogous.com..." (sometimes different host)
Expected result:
the page finishes loading
Some other investigation:
* happens intermittently both on beta and developers edition 57.0b6
* also happens intermittently on nightly (but might be less intermittent...?)
* doesn't happen on release 56.0 (tested 10 times, beta is hitting the issue at the same time)
* while bisecting, it seems that the frequency(?) of the issue is changing
* I haven't yet figured out if it's really network issue, it might be UI issue that it's out of sync
I'll attach network log shortly
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
here's network log
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
apparently the regression range in comment #2 is wrong.
I'm bisecting again now
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
revision 817a2c4234121c4fabf35922c170503f70e46b3f : failed 0/10
revision 269426fcc3f39673ae0b4aa167ac00d8534542ca : failed 4/10
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?fromchange=817a2c4234121c4fabf35922c170503f70e46b3f&tochange=269426fcc3f39673ae0b4aa167ac00d8534542ca
looks like it's from bug 1397880.
schien, can you have a look?
Blocks: 1397880
status-firefox56:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr52:
--- → unaffected
Flags: needinfo?(schien)
Keywords: regression
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
I've applied the following logging, based on m-c fd78928b00d8
https://hg.mozilla.org/try/rev/19252ba603d4097fbdb6d08fe51e312b443f4393
and here's the log both for failure case and successful case.
== failure case ==
[on step 3 (logged soon after clicking the button)]
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=1, mUntailTimer=0x132bfe9a0
[while shutting down]
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=0, mUntailTimer=0x0
!!!!!!!! removed=1, queue.empty=1, mUntailTimer=0x0
== successful case ==
[on step 3]
no message
[when the issue doesn't happen]
no message
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
@mayhemer, Is this related to bug 1401538?
Flags: needinfo?(schien) → needinfo?(honzab.moz)
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Tooru Fujisawa [:arai] from comment #5)
> [on step 3]
>
> no message
>
> [when the issue doesn't happen]
>
> no message
I meant [while shutting down]
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
In the log I can see two requests that are still pending:
http://platform.twitter.com/oct.js
https://recruit.112.2o7.net/...
Both are considered trackers and both are tailed and never untailed (in the log). Since RequestContext:5 module were not specified for the log, hard to say where the problem is, but I suspect it could be bug 1401538 as SC correctly pointed out.
Let's fix it and see what happens.
Tentatively assigning to me, if confirmed, will duplicate.
Thanks sc, I almost forgot about that bug!
Assignee: nobody → honzab.moz
Flags: needinfo?(honzab.moz)
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Honza Bambas (:mayhemer) from comment #8)
> Since RequestContext:5 module were not specified for the log, hard to
> say where the problem is, but I suspect it could be bug 1401538 as SC
> correctly pointed out.
is it better posting a log with RequestContext:5 ?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Tooru Fujisawa [:arai] from comment #9)
> (In reply to Honza Bambas (:mayhemer) from comment #8)
> > Since RequestContext:5 module were not specified for the log, hard to
> > say where the problem is, but I suspect it could be bug 1401538 as SC
> > correctly pointed out.
>
> is it better posting a log with RequestContext:5 ?
I think your effort will be better spent when I provide you with a testing build with a patch to test if it fixes the problem. I will post a link momentarily here.
Btw, thanks for this detailed report and the log!
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
Tooru, here [1] is a test build with the patch from bug 1401538. It's a modified Nightly, if you can, please give it a try. Thank you.
[1] https://queue.taskcluster.net/v1/task/dygsSlrfQhKfkI02_Nlq3g/runs/0/artifacts/public/build/target.dmg
Flags: needinfo?(arai.unmht)
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
testes 10 times, successfully finished loading 10 times :)
(beta failed at the same time, just for comparison)
Flags: needinfo?(arai.unmht)
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Tooru Fujisawa [:arai] from comment #12)
> testes 10 times, successfully finished loading 10 times :)
> (beta failed at the same time, just for comparison)
Thank you!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 14•8 years ago
|
||
It's confirmed to be fixed by bug 1401538, aligning the tracking status here.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•