My system is setup for 1024 x 768 256 colors . Mozilla browser displays the Web page as 1024 x 768 16 colors. I test it by loading Netscape ver 4.61 for OS/2 and loading the same Web page with both browsers and Mozilla Ver Mozilla 0.9.9+ Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020426 and Mozilla always displayed the page in 16 colors. Thanks
This probably won't make Mozilla 1.0. We have very few users using 256 colors.
Assignee: Matti → mkaply
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: colors not displayed correctly → No 256 color support
This looks like a dupe of 88560: Major jpeg display/dithering problem on NT w/ 256 colors. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88560
OS/2 will require custom code for this separate from the Windows code
*** Bug 95167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 110824 [details] [diff] [review] 256 color support First pass at 256 color. Only outstanding problem is that entryfields are missing their lower right lines. Working.
Created attachment 111408 [details] [diff] [review] Final patch Note this slows down the browser considerably. Welcome to 256 color.
Attachment #110824 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #111408 - Flags: review?(pedemont)
Comment on attachment 111408 [details] [diff] [review] Final patch > + mIsPaletteDevice = !!(alArray[CAPS_ADDITIONAL_GRAPHICS] & CAPS_PALETTE_MANAGER); Don't like this syntax. I think it would be much clearer if you explicitly checked to see if it was equal to a given value (i.e. "a & b == 0x001"). Otherwise, r=pedemont
Attachment #111408 - Flags: review?(pedemont) → review+
I disagree. If you see the 0x0001, then you have no idea what it means. Here I know what exactly he is testing. But it is ugly. Maybe a nice comment above the line? Notnot'ing is icky!
Fixed. We're slow but pretty.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.