Closed
Bug 1410019
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Suggested implicit call of 'Date.parse' method is incorrect
Categories
(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: General, enhancement, P5)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: ruvim.pinka, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
:: Developer Documentation Request Request Type: Correction Gecko Version: unspecified Technical Contact: :: Details On the mentioned manual page the two variants to call `parse` method are suggested: direct call and implicit call. But these variants return different values: Date.parse(dateString) returns number. new Date(dateString) returns object. Why do you suggest the second variant as alternative for the first one? Perhaps the following variant should be used as alternative instead: new Date(dateString).getTime()
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
MDN Web Docs' bug reporting has now moved to GitHub. From now on, please file content bugs at https://github.com/mdn/sprints/issues/ and platform bugs at https://github.com/mdn/kuma/issues/.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•