1412475 - Intermittent file:///Z:/task_1509147488/build/tests/jsreftest/tests/jsreftest.html?test=ecma_2/Exceptions/lexical-053.js | application terminated with exit code 1

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect, P5)

Description

[Treeherder Bug Filer]

Filed by: dluca [at] mozilla.com

https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=140350451&repo=mozilla-central

https://queue.taskcluster.net/v1/task/D3lunngsSEadb5MRaeICYA/runs/0/artifacts/public/test_info/jsreftest_errorsummary.log

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/layout/tools/reftest/reftest-analyzer.xhtml#logurl=https://queue.taskcluster.net/v1/task/D3lunngsSEadb5MRaeICYA/runs/0/artifacts/public/test_info/jsreftest_errorsummary.log&only_show_unexpected=1

Comment 1

[Intermittent Failures Robot]

1 failures in 912 pushes (0.001 failures/push) were associated with this bug in the last 7 days.    

Repository breakdown:
* mozilla-central: 1

Platform breakdown:
* windows10-64-nightly: 1

For more details, see:
https://brasstacks.mozilla.com/orangefactor/?display=Bug&bugid=1412475&startday=2017-10-23&endday=2017-10-29&tree=all

Comment 2

[André Bargull [:anba]]

From the logs:
---
Non-local network connections are disabled and a connection attempt to incoming.telemetry.mozilla.org (54.191.241.246) was made. You should only access hostnames available via the test networking proxy (if running mochitests) or from a test-specific httpd.js server (if running xpcshell tests). Browser services should be disabled or redirected to a local server.
---

so that's <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/1ebd2eff44617df3b82eea7d2f3ca1b60cc591a0/netwerk/base/nsSocketTransport2.cpp#1316-1331>.

Which makes me wonder why telemetry logging is enabled for CI tests?

Comment 3

[André Bargull [:anba]]

It looks like this was an intermittent issue because of bug 1406391. :chutten can you confirm this?

Comment 4

[Chris H-C :chutten]

Looks like this managed to catch the pre-backout version of the code from bug 1406391. The code was fixed and relanded on the 30. Should be fine.

Do you agree, :anba?

Comment 5

[André Bargull [:anba]]

Yes, that was my guess, too.

Comment 6

[André Bargull [:anba]]

And thanks for confirming! :-)