59 bytes, text/x-review-board-request
There's a binding 'stringbundleset' that does nothing except for extend="xul:box" - https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=stringbundleset - https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a21f4e2ce5186e2dc9ee411b07e9348866b4ef30/toolkit/content/widgets/stringbundle.xml#11 - https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a21f4e2ce5186e2dc9ee411b07e9348866b4ef30/toolkit/content/xul.css#971-974 AFAICT this can be removed, although we should keep `visibility: collapse` on the tag in xul.css.
From IRC: > so it is used for layout basically, but not clear to me why we need xul:box ever > Enn might recall if we have somewhere some special handling for this case Neil, are you aware of any reason why we have `extends="xul:box"` on a XBL binding?
For stringbundleset using xul:box wouldn't have any effect. History from bug 64449 suggests it was just copied from the following stringbundle binding and was just changed to xul:box even though the extends could have been removed.
Assignee: nobody → moz-ian
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 8936595 [details] Bug 1422374 - Remove pointless stringbudleset binding. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/207346/#review213884
Attachment #8936595 - Flags: review?(enndeakin) → review+
I'd have struggled to justify a try tun for this on its own, but it got a ride along with bug 1422934: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=51f8cb8187054201578d5c92b0a13e18a75aa4bc
Pushed by email@example.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/fc221281f554 Remove pointless stringbudleset binding. r=enndeakin+6102
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.