Closed
Bug 1423017
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Add telemetry to assess how widespread of a problem bug 1423013 ("overflowing content out of reach") is
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla62
People
(Reporter: botond, Assigned: xidorn)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 1 obsolete file)
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
botond
:
review+
|
Details |
|
2.79 KB,
text/plain
|
chutten
:
review+
|
Details |
|
1.39 KB,
patch
|
botond
:
review+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-beta-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
To decide how to resolve bug 1423013, which concerns content that overflows the initial containing block being "out of reach" on mobile websites that use overflow:hidden, it would be helpful to have telemetry to assess how widespread the issue is.
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
|
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: P1 → P3
|
Assignee | |
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → xidorn+moz
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8981296 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. We only care about the top level... I'll update.
Attachment #8981296 -
Flags: review?(mats)
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
Reporter | |
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8981296 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/247402/#review253428 Thanks for working on this, Xidorn! Note, though, that this probe will not discriminate between pages like the one in bug 1423013 comment 3 (where Firefox's behaviour matches Chrome's, and only differs from Safari's), and pages where our behaviour is different from Chrome's as well. We may want a more specific probe that only fires for pages of the second kind, as those are the kind of pages that users are complaining about.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8981296 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. Sounds like it's better to use a more complicate telemetry to count all three cases?
Attachment #8981296 -
Flags: review?(mats)
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
|
Assignee | |
Updated•6 years ago
|
Attachment #8981296 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
I guess we may need a data collection review request for a new telemetry entry, although it's effectively just another usecounter thing...
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8982406 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248354/#review254848 Thanks for the patch! Just to confirm my understanding: * OverflowWithoutScale documents have content that's out of reach in Firefox, but reachable in Chrome and Safari. * OverflowWithNoScale documents have content that's out of reach in Firefox, but reachable in Chrome and Safari. * OverflowWithScale documents have some content that's out of reach in Firefox but reachable in Chrome and Safari, and additional content that's out of reach in Firefox and Chrome but reachable in Safari. Does that match your understanding? (I also suggest some different names for these that may make things a bit clearer.) ::: dom/base/nsDocument.cpp:7396 (Diff revision 1) > +#ifdef DEBUG > + MOZ_ASSERT(mPresShell); > + nsPresContext* pc = GetPresContext(); > + MOZ_ASSERT(pc->GetViewportScrollbarStylesOverride().mHorizontal == > + NS_STYLE_OVERFLOW_HIDDEN, > + "Should only be called when viewport has overflow: hidden"); overflow: hidden -> overflow-x: hidden ::: dom/base/nsDocument.cpp:7409 (Diff revision 1) > + (GetWindow() && GetWindow()->IsDesktopModeViewport())) { > + mViewportOverflowType = ViewportOverflowType::OverflowDesktop; > + return; > + } > + if (mViewportType == DisplayWidthHeight) { > + mViewportOverflowType = ViewportOverflowType::OverflowHandheld; What is the motivation for handling this case specially? It sounds like mViewportType is set to DisplayWidthHeight when there is no <meta name="viewport"> tag, but there is some indication that the page is mobile-friendly, and so we choose a default mobile viewport (whose size matches the device's display size). It seems to me that the problematic scenario we are trying to address in bug 1423013, can occur on pages like this just as well as pages with a <meta name="viewport"> tag. Since there is no viewport tag and therefore no specified minimum scale, I think this scenario can be folded into OverflowWithNoScale. ::: dom/base/nsIDocument.h:4301 (Diff revision 1) > > ViewportType mViewportType; > > + // Enum for how content in this document overflows viewport causing > + // out-of-reach issue. Currently it only takes horizontal overflow > + // into consider. This enum and the corresponding field is only set consider -> consideration ::: dom/base/nsIDocument.h:4317 (Diff revision 1) > + // Meta viewport is disabled or the document is in desktop mode. > + OverflowDesktop, > + // Using viewport for handheld. > + OverflowHandheld, > + // The content would not overflow if minimum scale is applied. > + OverflowWithoutScale, I would suggest the following names and descriptions for the last three enumerators: // The content does not overflow the minimum-scale size OverflowsButNotMinScaleSize // There is no mininum-scale specified (...) OverflowsNoMinScale // The content overflows the minimum-scale size OverflowsMinScaleSize ::: layout/generic/nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp:431 (Diff revision 1) > } > } > > + if (mHelper.mIsRoot && > + aState->mStyles.mHorizontal == NS_STYLE_OVERFLOW_HIDDEN) { > + nscoord scrolledWidth = scrolledRect.width + 2 * oneDevPixel; What is the purpose of the 2?
Attachment #8982406 -
Flags: review?(botond)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment on attachment 8982406 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248354/#review254848 OverflowWithNoScale means there is no scale specified. It seems to me in that case, Chrome allows scroll to some extent, but not all content is reachable. Otherwise, yes, it matches my understanding. > What is the motivation for handling this case specially? It sounds like mViewportType is set to DisplayWidthHeight when there is no <meta name="viewport"> tag, but there is some indication that the page is mobile-friendly, and so we choose a default mobile viewport (whose size matches the device's display size). > > It seems to me that the problematic scenario we are trying to address in bug 1423013, can occur on pages like this just as well as pages with a <meta name="viewport"> tag. > > Since there is no viewport tag and therefore no specified minimum scale, I think this scenario can be folded into OverflowWithNoScale. I don't have specifically reason for it. It's just a different code path that we may be interested in, but I can fold it into OverflowWithNoScale. > I would suggest the following names and descriptions for the last three enumerators: > > // The content does not overflow the minimum-scale size > OverflowsButNotMinScaleSize > > // There is no mininum-scale specified (...) > OverflowsNoMinScale > > // The content overflows the minimum-scale size > OverflowsMinScaleSize Sounds good. Will use it. > What is the purpose of the 2? The original overflow check has `scrolledRect.XMost() >= visualScrollPortSize.width + oneDevPixel || scrolledRect.x <= -oneDevPixel` so I guess we may want to take two devpx here... but maybe not necessary?
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
Telemetry is complaining about "OverflowButNotMinScaleSize" is too long as a label value. I'm going to strip the "Overflow" prefix from the values (since the type is called "OverflowType" after all).
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #9) > OverflowWithNoScale means there is no scale specified. It seems to me in > that case, Chrome allows scroll to some extent, but not all content is > reachable. Interesting, that's not what I would have expected. Do you have a test case that demonstrates this? I'd like to run it by David Bokan (the Chromium developer who wrote the Web Viewports Explainer [1]) to understand how Chromium decides the limit (past which you can't scroll) in that case. [1] https://github.com/bokand/bokand.github.io/blob/master/web_viewports_explainer.md
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] from comment #12) > Interesting, that's not what I would have expected. Do you have a test case > that demonstrates this? I'd like to run it by David Bokan (the Chromium > developer who wrote the Web Viewports Explainer [1]) to understand how > Chromium decides the limit (past which you can't scroll) in that case. You can use the testcase in bug 1423013 comment 4 with the <meta> tag removed. That's the testcase I checked.
|
||
Comment 14•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] from comment #12) > (In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #9) > > OverflowWithNoScale means there is no scale specified. It seems to me in > > that case, Chrome allows scroll to some extent, but not all content is > > reachable. > > Interesting, that's not what I would have expected. Do you have a test case > that demonstrates this? I'd like to run it by David Bokan (the Chromium > developer who wrote the Web Viewports Explainer [1]) to understand how > Chromium decides the limit (past which you can't scroll) in that case. If there's no min-scale specified, Chrome will use a default of 0.25. In this case, there's still overflowing content at that scale so it's unreachable due to overflow-x.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 15•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Bokan from comment #14) > If there's no min-scale specified, Chrome will use a default of 0.25. In > this case, there's still overflowing content at that scale so it's > unreachable due to overflow-x. Ah, thanks for clarifying that! In light of that: Xidorn, do you think it would make sense to remove the NoMinScale option, and instead perform the calculation with a min-scale of 0.25 and classify the page as MinScaleSize or ButNotMinScaleSize accordingly?
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 16•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] from comment #15) > (In reply to David Bokan from comment #14) > > If there's no min-scale specified, Chrome will use a default of 0.25. In > > this case, there's still overflowing content at that scale so it's > > unreachable due to overflow-x. > > In light of that: Xidorn, do you think it would make sense to remove the > NoMinScale option, and instead perform the calculation with a min-scale of > 0.25 and classify the page as MinScaleSize or ButNotMinScaleSize accordingly? Play with the testcase a bit more, it seems to me that Chrome actually distinguish between whether there is a <meta name="viewport"> or not. When I only remove the minimum scale part, that testcase is fully reachable, probably because 0.25 is small enough to reach all the content (since the widest content is only 300%). However, if you remove the <meta> tag completely, the minimum scale seems to be about 0.7 or so. The 200% width block isn't fully reachable in that case. So it seems there are lots of different cases in handling this.
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 17•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #16) > Play with the testcase a bit more, it seems to me that Chrome actually > distinguish between whether there is a <meta name="viewport"> or not. > > When I only remove the minimum scale part, that testcase is fully reachable, > probably because 0.25 is small enough to reach all the content (since the > widest content is only 300%). > > However, if you remove the <meta> tag completely, the minimum scale seems to > be about 0.7 or so. The 200% width block isn't fully reachable in that case. > > So it seems there are lots of different cases in handling this. I have a hypothesis as to what's going on here: if there no is <meta name"viewport"> tag, Chrome chooses some default viewport width (e.g. 980px), and treats that as the "minimum size width" as well. (David, am I on the right track?) Assuming we can get a handle of the Chrome behaviour here, my preference would still be to replicate it for this calculation, and classify the page as either MinScaleSize or ButNotMinScaleSize accordingly.
|
|
||
Comment 18•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] from comment #17) > (In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #16) > I have a hypothesis as to what's going on here: if there no is <meta > name"viewport"> tag, Chrome chooses some default viewport width (e.g. > 980px), and treats that as the "minimum size width" as well. (David, am I on > the right track?) Sorry - I missed that detail on first look. Your observation is correct. The width=device-width means that width:100% will be sized to the device's viewport (if we're getting size from the Initial Containing Block). If you don't have a width attribute (or a viewport <meta> at all), Chrome will size the ICB to 980px wide so the content will also be sized differently. I'd recommend leaving width=device-width on all test cases to keep things consistent.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 19•6 years ago
|
||
That does sound like a weird behavior. Isn't percentage on width supposed to be based on ICB? Anyway, sounds like that's just related to percentage, so maybe it doesn't affect the issue in general.
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 21•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Bokan from comment #18) > (In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] from comment #17) > > (In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #16) > > I have a hypothesis as to what's going on here: if there no is <meta > > name"viewport"> tag, Chrome chooses some default viewport width (e.g. > > 980px), and treats that as the "minimum size width" as well. (David, am I on > > the right track?) > > Sorry - I missed that detail on first look. Your observation is correct. The > width=device-width means that width:100% will be sized to the device's > viewport (if we're getting size from the Initial Containing Block). If you > don't have a width attribute (or a viewport <meta> at all), Chrome will size > the ICB to 980px wide so the content will also be sized differently. Ah, so the minimum scale in such a situation is still 0.25, and thus the minimum scale size is unchanged, but the content size has increased, causing it to now overflow. Thanks for clarifying, I had overlooked that. (In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #19) > That does sound like a weird behavior. Isn't percentage on width supposed to > be based on ICB? Yes, but the ICB width comes from the width in the viewport <meta> tag, or a default value (980px) if there is no viewport <meta> tag.
|
|
||
Comment 22•6 years ago
|
||
> Ah, so the minimum scale in such a situation is still 0.25, and thus the minimum scale size is unchanged, but the content size has increased, causing it to now overflow. Thanks for clarifying, I had overlooked that.
Yup - to be clear, the default minimum scale is 0.25 but we then clamp it if necessary so that you can't zoom out past the content width. So the used minimum scale may be larger depending on how content in the page lays out. (Which may depend on the ICB which depends on the existence or width attr of the viewport meta tag).|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 23•6 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8982406 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248354/#review256202 Thanks! (Request for future: please avoid rebasing between iterations, to keep interdiffs usable.)
Attachment #8982406 -
Flags: review?(botond) → review+
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 24•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Bokan from comment #22) > Yup - to be clear, the default minimum scale is 0.25 but we then clamp it if > necessary so that you can't zoom out past the content width. So the used > minimum scale may be larger depending on how content in the page lays out. > (Which may depend on the ICB which depends on the existence or width attr of > the viewport meta tag). Yup, understood. (It doesn't make a difference for the patch in this case, as we're just looking to discriminate cases where the content size overflows the minimum scale size, vs. cases where it doesn't vs. cases where it doesn't overflow the ICB size at all.)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 25•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] [standards meeting June 4-9] from comment #23) > (Request for future: please avoid rebasing between iterations, to keep > interdiffs usable.) That's pretty hard... I frequently rebase all my local patches with the latest m-c so that I can fix any conflict quickly and have merged patches collapse themselves directly without manual operation. It's generally not a big problem as most files aren't updated as frequently as nsDocument.cpp, and patches aren't usually take this long to land. I really hope interdiffs can be improved to address rebase, but that's probably very hard as well...
|
||
Comment 26•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by xquan@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/ad8f78a9b78c Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. r=botond
|
||
Comment 27•6 years ago
|
||
Backed out changeset ad8f78a9b78c (bug 1423017) for causing multiple failures at build/src/dom/base/nsDocument.cpp on a CLOSED TREE Backout: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/e9a0eeeed39a9d7d9fd17a28dceb5a36f6e66dfa Failure push: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=autoland&revision=ad8f78a9b78cbc2620526c99e1a2892ebeb845f0 Failure log: Mn failures: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=182284407&repo=autoland&lineNumber=494 Wr failures: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=182284410&repo=autoland&lineNumber=558 R2 failures: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=182284412&repo=autoland&lineNumber=659
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 31•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8982406 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. I guess it's worth another review. I didn't think it can break things but it does... Only nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp is updated (and basically rewritten) so you can just review that. The main reason there is that aState->mStyles can be affected by other factors, e.g. scrollbar attribute on window.open. I don't think we care about that, so in this patch I instead use GetViewportScrollbarStylesOverride() directly. In this reversion I also rewrite the checks to use a loop-break style rather than nested if-block.
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
Attachment #8982406 -
Flags: review+ → review?(botond)
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 32•6 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8982406 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248354/#review256492 This is the first time I saw |do { ... } while (false);| used this way to enable you to write early-return style code using |break| in a smaller scope than the whole function. Pretty neat!
Attachment #8982406 -
Flags: review?(botond) → review+
|
||
Comment 33•6 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review | ||
Comment on attachment 8982406 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248354/#review256494 ::: layout/generic/nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp:447 (Diff revision 6) > + ScrollbarStyles styles = pc->GetViewportScrollbarStylesOverride(); > + if (styles.mHorizontal != NS_STYLE_OVERFLOW_HIDDEN) { > + break; > + } > + // Only top level content document is considered. > + nsIDocument* doc = PresContext()->Document(); drive-by nit: you can just use `pc` instead of calling `PresContext()` again.
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 35•6 years ago
|
||
| mozreview-review-reply | ||
Comment on attachment 8982406 [details] Bug 1423017 - Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/248354/#review256494 > drive-by nit: you can just use `pc` instead of calling `PresContext()` again. You're right. I think I intended to do that, but forgot at last...
|
|
||
Comment 36•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by xquan@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/83c614479dda Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. r=botond
|
||
Comment 37•6 years ago
|
||
Backed out changeset 83c614479dda (bug 1423017) For braking Android reftests Backout revision https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/39913642590f07aa9350bda3d00e1607baf1194d Failed push: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=autoland&revision=83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82&filter-resultStatus=testfailed&filter-resultStatus=busted&filter-resultStatus=exception&filter-classifiedState=unclassified Link to failure log:https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=182482770&repo=autoland&lineNumber=1525 Part of that log:[task 2018-06-08T10:19:17.197Z] 10:19:17 INFO - REFTEST TEST-START | http://10.0.2.2:8888/tests/layout/reftests/position-relative/1115999-1.html == http://10.0.2.2:8888/tests/layout/reftests/position-relative/1115999-1-ref.html [task 2018-06-08T10:19:17.197Z] 10:19:17 INFO - REFTEST TEST-LOAD | http://10.0.2.2:8888/tests/layout/reftests/position-relative/1115999-1.html | 57 / 271 (21%) [task 2018-06-08T10:19:38.428Z] 10:19:38 INFO - INFO | automation.py | Application ran for: 0:13:38.565239 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:38.428Z] 10:19:38 INFO - INFO | zombiecheck | Reading PID log: /tmp/tmpI2LXA7pidlog [task 2018-06-08T10:19:39.046Z] 10:19:39 INFO - /data/tombstones does not exist; tombstone check skipped [task 2018-06-08T10:19:39.862Z] 10:19:39 INFO - REFTEST INFO | Copy/paste: /usr/local/bin/linux64-minidump_stackwalk /tmp/tmp76B8GD/59043e04-43bc-de9c-2d5b-e451b6513b39.dmp /builds/worker/workspace/build/symbols [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.878Z] 10:19:49 INFO - REFTEST INFO | Saved minidump as /builds/worker/workspace/build/blobber_upload_dir/59043e04-43bc-de9c-2d5b-e451b6513b39.dmp [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.878Z] 10:19:49 INFO - REFTEST INFO | Saved app info as /builds/worker/workspace/build/blobber_upload_dir/59043e04-43bc-de9c-2d5b-e451b6513b39.extra [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.883Z] 10:19:49 INFO - REFTEST PROCESS-CRASH | http://10.0.2.2:8888/tests/layout/reftests/position-relative/1115999-1.html == http://10.0.2.2:8888/tests/layout/reftests/position-relative/1115999-1-ref.html | application crashed [@ nsIDocument::UpdateViewportOverflowType(int, int)] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.883Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Crash dump filename: /tmp/tmp76B8GD/59043e04-43bc-de9c-2d5b-e451b6513b39.dmp [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.883Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Operating system: Android [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.884Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 0.0.0 Linux 2.6.29-gea477bb #1 Wed Sep 26 11:04:45 PDT 2012 armv7l [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.884Z] 10:19:49 INFO - CPU: arm [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.884Z] 10:19:49 INFO - ARMv7 ARM Cortex-A8 features: swp,half,thumb,fastmult,vfpv2,edsp,neon,vfpv3 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.884Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 1 CPU [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.885Z] 10:19:49 INFO - GPU: UNKNOWN [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.885Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Crash reason: SIGSEGV [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.886Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Crash address: 0x0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.886Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Process uptime: not available [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.886Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Thread 12 (crashed) [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.886Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 0 libxul.so!nsIDocument::UpdateViewportOverflowType(int, int) [nsDocument.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 0 + 0x6] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.886Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r0 = 0x00000000 r1 = 0x326ff940 r2 = 0x602982f4 r3 = 0x00001cb9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.887Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00001cb9 r5 = 0x0000bb80 r6 = 0x0000bbbc r7 = 0x52a0cc30 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.887Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x55e86000 r9 = 0x52a0ce38 r10 = 0x0000bb80 r12 = 0x00000003 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.888Z] 10:19:49 INFO - fp = 0x5a0870d0 sp = 0x52a0cc20 lr = 0x5ca33fc1 pc = 0x5d4eb53a [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.888Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: given as instruction pointer in context [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.888Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 1 libxul.so!nsHTMLScrollFrame::TryLayout(mozilla::ScrollReflowInput*, mozilla::ReflowOutput*, bool, bool, bool) [nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 451 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.889Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x0000bbbc r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x52a0ccf0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.890Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x55e86000 r9 = 0x52a0ce38 r10 = 0x0000bb80 fp = 0x5a0870d0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.890Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0cc38 lr = 0x5e37ad47 pc = 0x5e37ad47 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.890Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.890Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 2 libxul.so!nsHTMLScrollFrame::ReflowContents(mozilla::ScrollReflowInput*, mozilla::ReflowOutput const&) [nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 747 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.890Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0ce38 r5 = 0x5a0870d0 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x52a0cd98 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.891Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0cd30 r9 = 0x52a0d030 r10 = 0x52a0cdc8 fp = 0x5a08719c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.891Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ccf8 lr = 0x5e37b677 pc = 0x5e37b677 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.891Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.892Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 3 libxul.so!nsHTMLScrollFrame::Reflow(nsPresContext*, mozilla::ReflowOutput&, mozilla::ReflowInput const&, nsReflowStatus&) [nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 1080 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.892Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0cf60 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x5a0870d0 r7 = 0x52a0cef8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.892Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0ce38 r9 = 0x52a0d030 r10 = 0x52a0cdc8 fp = 0x5a08719c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.893Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0cda0 lr = 0x5e37be1f pc = 0x5e37be1f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.893Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.893Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 4 libxul.so!nsContainerFrame::ReflowChild(nsIFrame*, nsPresContext*, mozilla::ReflowOutput&, mozilla::ReflowInput const&, int, int, unsigned int, nsReflowStatus&, nsOverflowContinuationTracker*) [nsContainerFrame.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 995 + 0x13] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.894Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5a0870d0 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x5e37bc81 r7 = 0x52a0cf28 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.894Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0cf60 r9 = 0x52a0d030 r10 = 0x52a0d15c fp = 0x55e86000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.894Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0cf00 lr = 0x5e332e95 pc = 0x5e332e95 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 5 libxul.so!mozilla::ViewportFrame::Reflow(nsPresContext*, mozilla::ReflowOutput&, mozilla::ReflowInput const&, nsReflowStatus&) [ViewportFrame.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 335 + 0x19] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0d030 r5 = 0x55e86000 r6 = 0x52a0d160 r7 = 0x52a0d0b0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d1c4 r9 = 0x52a0d1c0 r10 = 0x5a0870d0 fp = 0x00000000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0cf30 lr = 0x5e332a79 pc = 0x5e332a79 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 6 libxul.so!mozilla::PresShell::DoReflow(nsIFrame*, bool) [PresShell.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 8940 + 0xf] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5e332969 r5 = 0x52a0d160 r6 = 0x5a087010 r7 = 0x52a0d2d0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d110 r9 = 0x59851000 r10 = 0x59851008 fp = 0x00000000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d0b8 lr = 0x5e2c9fd1 pc = 0x5e2c9fd1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.897Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.898Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 7 libxul.so!mozilla::PresShell::ProcessReflowCommands(bool) [PresShell.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 9113 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.898Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5a087010 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x59851a20 r7 = 0x52a0d318 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.898Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x00000000 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x59851000 fp = 0x59851981 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.899Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d2d8 lr = 0x5e2cdd43 pc = 0x5e2cdd43 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.899Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.899Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 8 libxul.so!mozilla::PresShell::DoFlushPendingNotifications(mozilla::ChangesToFlush) [PresShell.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 4335 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.899Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x59851000 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x52a0d328 r7 = 0x52a0d388 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.900Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d32c r9 = 0x00000007 r10 = 0x59851004 fp = 0x59851981 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.900Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d320 lr = 0x5e2cd8ff pc = 0x5e2cd8ff [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.900Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.900Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 9 libxul.so!nsIDocument::FlushPendingNotifications(mozilla::ChangesToFlush) [nsDocument.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 7496 + 0x3] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.901Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x55e75800 r5 = 0x00000107 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d3b0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.901Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d5a0 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x59f6f4c0 fp = 0x000012ac [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.901Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d390 lr = 0x5d4eb6e9 pc = 0x5d4eb6e9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.901Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.902Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 10 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::Element::GetPrimaryFrame(mozilla::FlushType) [Element.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 2276 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.902Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x59f6f4c0 r5 = 0x00000007 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d3c0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.902Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d5a0 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x59f6f4c0 fp = 0x000012ac [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.903Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d3b8 lr = 0x5d47faed pc = 0x5d47faed [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.903Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.903Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 11 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::Element::GetStyledFrame() [Element.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 664 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.903Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00000000 r5 = 0x52a0d428 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d3c8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.904Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d5a0 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x59f6f4c0 fp = 0x000012ac [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.904Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d3c8 lr = 0x5d47fac9 pc = 0x5d47fac9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.904Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.904Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 12 libxul.so!nsGenericHTMLElement::GetOffsetRect(mozilla::gfx::IntRectTyped<mozilla::CSSPixel>&) [nsGenericHTMLElement.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 228 + 0x3] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.905Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00000000 r5 = 0x52a0d428 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d420 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.905Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d5a0 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x59f6f4c0 fp = 0x000012ac [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.905Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d3d0 lr = 0x5dca0935 pc = 0x5dca0935 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.905Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.906Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 13 libxul.so!nsGenericHTMLElement::OffsetHeight() [nsGenericHTMLElement.h:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 235 + 0x3] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.906Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0d44c r5 = 0x59f6f4c0 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d438 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.906Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d5a0 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x5da55119 fp = 0x000012ac [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.907Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d428 lr = 0x5d9add5d pc = 0x5d9add5d [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.907Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.907Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 14 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::HTMLElementBinding::get_offsetHeight(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JSObject*>, nsGenericHTMLElement*, JSJitGetterCallArgs) [HTMLElementBinding.cpp: : 1186 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.907Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r3 = 0x00000000 r4 = 0x00000000 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x00000000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.908Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r7 = 0x52a0d470 r8 = 0x52a0d5a0 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x5da55119 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.908Z] 10:19:49 INFO - fp = 0x000012ac sp = 0x52a0d440 lr = 0x5d9adcdf pc = 0x5d9adcdf [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.908Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.909Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 15 libxul.so!bool mozilla::dom::binding_detail::GenericGetter<mozilla::dom::binding_detail::NormalThisPolicy, mozilla::dom::binding_detail::ThrowExceptions>(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*) [BindingUtils.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 3161 + 0x1] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.909Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r2 = 0x000004a0 r3 = 0x00000007 r4 = 0x609ec8b4 r5 = 0x5d9adca1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.910Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r6 = 0x00000001 r7 = 0x52a0d4c0 r8 = 0x000000d8 r9 = 0x52a0d48c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.910Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r10 = 0x5da55119 fp = 0x000012ac sp = 0x52a0d478 lr = 0x5da551ab [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.910Z] 10:19:49 INFO - pc = 0x5da551ab [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.911Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.911Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 16 libxul.so!js::CallJSNative(JSContext*, bool (*)(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*), JS::CallArgs const&) [JSContext-inl.h:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 274 + 0x3] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.911Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5580d800 r5 = 0x52a0d580 r6 = 0x52a0d5b0 r7 = 0x52a0d4f0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.911Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d4cc r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x5da55119 fp = 0x000012ac [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.912Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d4c8 lr = 0x5ed27137 pc = 0x5ed27137 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.912Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.913Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 17 libxul.so!js::InternalCallOrConstruct(JSContext*, JS::CallArgs const&, js::MaybeConstruct) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 471 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.913Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00000001 r5 = 0x52a0d580 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x52a0d550 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.913Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x00000000 r9 = 0x52a0d718 r10 = 0x52a0d528 fp = 0x5580d800 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.913Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d4f8 lr = 0x5ed26e41 pc = 0x5ed26e41 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.914Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.914Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 18 libxul.so!InternalCall(JSContext*, js::AnyInvokeArgs const&) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 520 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.914Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0d580 r5 = 0x5580d800 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d578 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.915Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d580 r9 = 0x52a0d718 r10 = 0x52a0d5f8 fp = 0x52a0d668 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.915Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d558 lr = 0x5ed2776d pc = 0x5ed2776d [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.915Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.916Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 19 libxul.so!js::CallGetter(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JS::Value>, JS::Handle<JS::Value>, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 539 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.916Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00000000 r5 = 0x6e03f058 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d5d8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.916Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d580 r9 = 0x52a0d718 r10 = 0x52a0d5f8 fp = 0x52a0d668 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.917Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d580 lr = 0x5ed27fd5 pc = 0x5ed27fd5 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.917Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.918Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 20 libxul.so!bool GetExistingProperty<(js::AllowGC)1>(JSContext*, js::MaybeRooted<JS::Value, (js::AllowGC)1>::HandleType, js::MaybeRooted<js::NativeObject*, (js::AllowGC)1>::HandleType, js::MaybeRooted<js::Shape*, (js::AllowGC)1>::HandleType, js::MaybeRooted<JS::Value, (js::AllowGC)1>::MutableHandleType) [NativeObject.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 2109 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.918Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0d718 r5 = 0x52a0d5f0 r6 = 0x52a0d680 r7 = 0x52a0d620 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.918Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0xffffff83 r9 = 0x5580d800 r10 = 0x6e03f058 fp = 0x52a0d668 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.918Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d5e0 lr = 0x5f233dc9 pc = 0x5f233dc9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.919Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.919Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 21 libxul.so!bool NativeGetPropertyInline<(js::AllowGC)1>(JSContext*, js::MaybeRooted<js::NativeObject*, (js::AllowGC)1>::HandleType, js::MaybeRooted<JS::Value, (js::AllowGC)1>::HandleType, js::MaybeRooted<jsid, (js::AllowGC)1>::HandleType, IsNameLookup, js::MaybeRooted<JS::Value, (js::AllowGC)1>::MutableHandleType) [NativeObject.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 2375 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.920Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0d678 r5 = 0x5580d800 r6 = 0x52a0d668 r7 = 0x52a0d6b8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.920Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d647 r9 = 0x5580d810 r10 = 0x00000004 fp = 0x0003fff0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.920Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d628 lr = 0x5f2342c3 pc = 0x5f2342c3 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.921Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.921Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 22 libxul.so!js::NativeGetProperty(JSContext*, JS::Handle<js::NativeObject*>, JS::Handle<JS::Value>, JS::Handle<jsid>, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) [NativeObject.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 2411 + 0xb] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.921Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5a455d80 r5 = 0x52a0d70c r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d6c8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.921Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d718 r9 = 0x52a0d6d4 r10 = 0x6e03f058 fp = 0x52a0da1c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.922Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d6c0 lr = 0x5f233fff pc = 0x5f233fff [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.922Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.922Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 23 libxul.so!js::GetProperty(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JSObject*>, JS::Handle<JS::Value>, js::PropertyName*, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) [NativeObject.h:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 1679 + 0xb] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.922Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5a455d80 r5 = 0x52a0d70c r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0d6f8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.923Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0d718 r9 = 0x52a0d6d4 r10 = 0x6e03f058 fp = 0x52a0da1c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.923Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d6d0 lr = 0x5ecd4ff7 pc = 0x5ecd4ff7 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.923Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.924Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 24 libxul.so!js::GetProperty(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JS::Value>, JS::Handle<js::PropertyName*>, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 4449 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.924Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0d704 r5 = 0x5580d800 r6 = 0x52a0d710 r7 = 0x52a0d740 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.924Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x6e03f058 r9 = 0x52a0daa8 r10 = 0x6e03f058 fp = 0x52a0da1c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.924Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d700 lr = 0x5ed2adbf pc = 0x5ed2adbf [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.925Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.925Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 25 libxul.so!Interpret(JSContext*, js::RunState&) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 217 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.925Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0da50 r5 = 0x6df8d658 r6 = 0x6e03f018 r7 = 0x52a0daf8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.926Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x5580d800 r9 = 0xffffff83 r10 = 0x6e03f058 fp = 0x52a0da1c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.926Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0d748 lr = 0x5ed1dae1 pc = 0x5ed1dae1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.926Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.927Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 26 libxul.so!js::RunScript(JSContext*, js::RunState&) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 421 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.927Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0db48 r5 = 0x5580d800 r6 = 0x5aeb4090 r7 = 0x52a0db20 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.927Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x0003fff0 r9 = 0x60afabb8 r10 = 0x60afac00 fp = 0xfffc0000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.927Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0db00 lr = 0x5ed18683 pc = 0x5ed18683 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.927Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.928Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 27 libxul.so!js::ExecuteKernel(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JSScript*>, JSObject&, JS::Value const&, js::AbstractFramePtr, JS::Value*) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 704 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.928Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5580d800 r5 = 0x52a0db48 r6 = 0x6cfdf020 r7 = 0x52a0dba8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.929Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x0003fff0 r9 = 0x60afabb8 r10 = 0x60afac00 fp = 0xfffc0000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.929Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0db28 lr = 0x5ed28483 pc = 0x5ed28483 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.929Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.930Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 28 libxul.so!js::Execute(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JSScript*>, JSObject&, JS::Value*) [Interpreter.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 736 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.930Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00000000 r5 = 0x52a0dbb8 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0dbe8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.930Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0dd50 r9 = 0x52a0dc28 r10 = 0x52a0dbc4 fp = 0x52a0dc2c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.931Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0dbb0 lr = 0x5ed28945 pc = 0x5ed28945 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.931Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.931Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 29 libxul.so!ExecuteScript(JSContext*, JS::Handle<JSObject*>, JS::Handle<JSScript*>, JS::Value*) [jsapi.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 4737 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.932Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0dc40 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x5580d800 r7 = 0x52a0dc10 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.932Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0dd50 r9 = 0x52a0dc28 r10 = 0x52a0dc38 fp = 0x52a0dc2c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.932Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0dbf0 lr = 0x5f0bb70f pc = 0x5f0bb70f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.933Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.933Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 30 libxul.so!ExecuteScript(JSContext*, JS::AutoVector<JSObject*>&, JS::Handle<JSScript*>, JS::Value*) [jsapi.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 4756 + 0xb] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.933Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0xfffc0000 r5 = 0x5580d800 r6 = 0x52a0dc20 r7 = 0x52a0dc60 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.934Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0dc28 r9 = 0x52a0dc40 r10 = 0x52a0dc38 fp = 0x52a0dc2c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.934Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0dc18 lr = 0x5f0bbacf pc = 0x5f0bbacf [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.934Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.934Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 31 libxul.so!nsJSUtils::ExecutionContext::CompileAndExec(JS::CompileOptions&, JS::SourceBufferHolder&, JS::MutableHandle<JSScript*>) [nsJSUtils.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 268 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.935Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00530002 r5 = 0x52a0dd30 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x52a0dc78 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.935Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0ddb8 r9 = 0x52d98370 r10 = 0x5429c7c0 fp = 0x52a0ddb8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.935Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0dc68 lr = 0x5d51ca1d pc = 0x5d51ca1d [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.936Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.936Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 32 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::ScriptLoader::EvaluateScript(mozilla::dom::ScriptLoadRequest*) [ScriptLoader.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 2354 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.936Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0dca0 r5 = 0x52d98340 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x52a0dec0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.937Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0dc94 r9 = 0x52d98370 r10 = 0x5429c7c0 fp = 0x52a0ddb8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.937Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0dc80 lr = 0x5e0ef005 pc = 0x5e0ef005 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.937Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.937Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 33 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::ScriptLoader::ProcessRequest(mozilla::dom::ScriptLoadRequest*) [ScriptLoader.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 1977 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.938Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52d98340 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x52d9835c r7 = 0x52a0df08 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.938Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x5429c7c0 r9 = 0x00000001 r10 = 0x00000000 fp = 0x5949fe4c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.938Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0dec8 lr = 0x5e0ede8b pc = 0x5e0ede8b [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.939Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.939Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 34 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::ScriptLoader::ProcessInlineScript(nsIScriptElement*, mozilla::dom::ScriptKind) [ScriptLoader.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 1598 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.939Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0dfb8 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x0000000f r7 = 0x52a0dfd8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.940Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x5429c7c0 r9 = 0x00000001 r10 = 0x00000000 fp = 0x5949fe4c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.940Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0df10 lr = 0x5e0ed40b pc = 0x5e0ed40b [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.941Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.941Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 35 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::ScriptLoader::ProcessScriptElement(nsIScriptElement*) [ScriptLoader.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 1317 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.941Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5949fe4c r5 = 0x5429c7c0 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x52a0e268 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.941Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0e1c0 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x52a0e1c0 fp = 0x5424fc54 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.942Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0dfe0 lr = 0x5e0e7ce3 pc = 0x5e0e7ce3 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.942Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.942Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 36 libxul.so!mozilla::dom::ScriptElement::MaybeProcessScript() [ScriptElement.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 141 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.943Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5949fe4c r5 = 0x52a0e27c r6 = 0x55e75800 r7 = 0x52a0e298 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.943Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0e2e4 r9 = 0x52a0e2f0 r10 = 0x52a0e2ee fp = 0x5424fc54 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.943Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e270 lr = 0x5e0e79fb pc = 0x5e0e79fb [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.943Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.944Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 37 libxul.so!nsIScriptElement::AttemptToExecute() [nsIScriptElement.h:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 247 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.944Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5949fe4c r5 = 0x52a0e2b4 r6 = 0x5949fe4c r7 = 0x52a0e2a8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.945Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0e2e4 r9 = 0x52a0e2f0 r10 = 0x52a0e2ee fp = 0x5424fc54 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.945Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e2a0 lr = 0x5d1c940b pc = 0x5d1c940b [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.945Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.945Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 38 libxul.so!nsHtml5TreeOpExecutor::RunScript(nsIContent*) [nsHtml5TreeOpExecutor.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 738 + 0x3] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.946Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5424fb00 r5 = 0x52a0e2b4 r6 = 0x5949fe4c r7 = 0x52a0e2c8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.946Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0e2e4 r9 = 0x52a0e2f0 r10 = 0x52a0e2ee fp = 0x5424fc54 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.947Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e2b0 lr = 0x5d1c8f35 pc = 0x5d1c8f35 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.947Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.947Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 39 libxul.so!nsHtml5TreeOpExecutor::RunFlushLoop() [nsHtml5TreeOpExecutor.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 537 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.947Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5424fb00 r5 = 0x52a0e2ef r6 = 0x804e03ef r7 = 0x52a0e320 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.948Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0e2e4 r9 = 0x52a0e2f0 r10 = 0x52a0e2ee fp = 0x5424fc54 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.948Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e2d0 lr = 0x5d1c81ef pc = 0x5d1c81ef [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.948Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.948Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 40 libxul.so!nsHtml5ExecutorFlusher::Run() [nsHtml5StreamParser.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 121 + 0x3] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.949Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x58ecf614 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x00000021 r7 = 0x52a0e330 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.949Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52d08700 r9 = 0x52a0e37d r10 = 0x52a0e380 fp = 0x52a0e87f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.949Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e328 lr = 0x5d1caa05 pc = 0x5d1caa05 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.950Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.950Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 41 libxul.so!nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(bool, bool*) [nsThread.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 1088 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.950Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00000000 r5 = 0x00000000 r6 = 0x00000021 r7 = 0x52a0e870 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.951Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52d08700 r9 = 0x52a0e37d r10 = 0x52a0e380 fp = 0x52a0e87f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.951Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e338 lr = 0x5cac797d pc = 0x5cac797d [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.951Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.952Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 42 libxul.so!NS_ProcessNextEvent(nsIThread*, bool) [nsThreadUtils.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 519 + 0xd] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.952Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x00000000 r5 = 0x52d08700 r6 = 0x00000001 r7 = 0x52a0e890 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.952Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52d0250c r9 = 0x52d08700 r10 = 0x52d02500 fp = 0x6167f7e0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.952Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e878 lr = 0x5cacf879 pc = 0x5cacf879 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.953Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.953Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 43 libxul.so!mozilla::ipc::MessagePump::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*) [MessagePump.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 97 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.954Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52d024f0 r5 = 0x52d2e030 r6 = 0x00000001 r7 = 0x52a0e8b8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.954Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52d0250c r9 = 0x52d08700 r10 = 0x52d02500 fp = 0x6167f7e0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.954Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e898 lr = 0x5ce4d8f5 pc = 0x5ce4d8f5 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.954Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.955Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 44 libxul.so!MessageLoop::RunInternal() [message_loop.cc:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 325 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.955Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52d2e030 r5 = 0x52d08700 r6 = 0x5ca86619 r7 = 0x52a0e8d8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.955Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0eab8 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x604c7582 fp = 0x6167f7e0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.956Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e8c0 lr = 0x5ce058e1 pc = 0x5ce058e1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.956Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.957Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 45 libxul.so!MessageLoop::Run() [message_loop.cc:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 318 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.957Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r0 = 0x52d2e030 r1 = 0x00000000 r2 = 0x00000001 r3 = 0x00000022 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.957Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52d2e030 r5 = 0x52d08700 r6 = 0x5ca86619 r7 = 0x52a0e8f8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.958Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0eab8 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x604c7582 fp = 0x6167f7e0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.958Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e8e0 lr = 0x5ce0588f pc = 0x5ce0588f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.958Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.958Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 46 libxul.so!nsBaseAppShell::Run() [nsBaseAppShell.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 157 + 0x3] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.959Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r0 = 0x00000001 r1 = 0x52d09600 r2 = 0x52d2e030 r3 = 0x00000000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.959Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52d6e580 r5 = 0x52d08700 r6 = 0x5ca86619 r7 = 0x52a0e910 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.959Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0eab8 r9 = 0x00000000 r10 = 0x604c7582 fp = 0x6167f7e0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.960Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0e900 lr = 0x5e175f55 pc = 0x5e175f55 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.960Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.960Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 47 libxul.so!nsAppStartup::Run() [nsAppStartup.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 290 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.961Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r2 = 0x00000001 r3 = 0x00000000 r4 = 0x559267f0 r5 = 0x52a0eb9d [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.961Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r6 = 0x5ca86619 r7 = 0x52a0e928 r8 = 0x52a0eab8 r9 = 0x00000000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.961Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r10 = 0x604c7582 fp = 0x6167f7e0 sp = 0x52a0e918 lr = 0x5ebb466f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.962Z] 10:19:49 INFO - pc = 0x5ebb466f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.962Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.962Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 48 libxul.so!XREMain::XRE_mainRun() [nsAppRunner.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 4746 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.963Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r2 = 0x00000001 r3 = 0x00000000 r4 = 0x52a0ea10 r5 = 0x52a0eb9d [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.963Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r6 = 0x5ca86619 r7 = 0x52a0ea38 r8 = 0x52a0eab8 r9 = 0x00000000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.963Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r10 = 0x604c7582 fp = 0x6167f7e0 sp = 0x52a0e930 lr = 0x5ec295e5 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.964Z] 10:19:49 INFO - pc = 0x5ec295e5 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.964Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.964Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 49 libxul.so!XREMain::XRE_main(int, char**, mozilla::BootstrapConfig const&) [nsAppRunner.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 4891 + 0x5] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.965Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0eacc r5 = 0x5ca911b1 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x52a0eab0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.965Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0eab8 r9 = 0x52a0ead0 r10 = 0x52a0ea51 fp = 0x52a0ea58 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.965Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ea40 lr = 0x5ec29e3b pc = 0x5ec29e3b [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.966Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.966Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 50 libxul.so!XRE_main(int, char**, mozilla::BootstrapConfig const&) [nsAppRunner.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 4983 + 0x9] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.966Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52a0ebb8 r5 = 0x52d044e0 r6 = 0x00000006 r7 = 0x52a0ebb0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.967Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52a0eab8 r9 = 0x2a327150 r10 = 0x00000006 fp = 0x22100005 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.967Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0eab8 lr = 0x5ec2a28f pc = 0x5ec2a28f [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.967Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.968Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 51 libxul.so!GeckoStart [nsAndroidStartup.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 48 + 0x7] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.968Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x52d044e0 r5 = 0x52b84668 r6 = 0x52b4bd88 r7 = 0x52a0ebd0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.969Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x00000006 r9 = 0x2a327150 r10 = 0x00000006 fp = 0x22100005 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.969Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ebb8 lr = 0x5ec2cb7b pc = 0x5ec2cb7b [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.969Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.970Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 52 libmozglue.so!Java_org_mozilla_gecko_mozglue_GeckoLoader_nativeRun [APKOpen.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 408 + 0x11] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.970Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r4 = 0x5ec2f50d r5 = 0x52d044e0 r6 = 0x2a1ea388 r7 = 0x52a0ec10 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.970Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r8 = 0x52b839c4 r9 = 0x2a327150 r10 = 0x00000006 fp = 0x22100005 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.971Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ebd8 lr = 0x52a6cc05 pc = 0x52a6cc05 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.971Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.971Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 53 libdvm.so + 0x1dc4e [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.971Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r1 = 0x52b4bd88 r2 = 0x22100005 r3 = 0xffffffff r4 = 0x4c78ba38 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.972Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r5 = 0x2a1e8690 r6 = 0x00000000 r7 = 0x5290efb4 r8 = 0x52a0ec24 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.972Z] 10:19:49 INFO - r9 = 0x5290efa0 r10 = 0x2a1e86a0 fp = 0x52a0ec3c sp = 0x52a0ec18 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.972Z] 10:19:49 INFO - lr = 0x4085bc50 pc = 0x4085bc50 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.973Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: call frame info [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.973Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 54 libdvm.so + 0x48dc3 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.973Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec28 pc = 0x40886dc5 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.974Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.974Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 55 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x5c264b [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.974Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec34 pc = 0x524b464d [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.975Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.975Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 56 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x29a9c6 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.975Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec38 pc = 0x4174f9c8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.975Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.976Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 57 libdvm.so + 0x4dcad [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.976Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec40 pc = 0x4088bcaf [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.976Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.976Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 58 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x5c2645 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.977Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec48 pc = 0x524b4647 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.977Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.977Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 59 libmozglue.so!loadNSSLibs(char const*) [APKOpen.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 0 + 0x3b] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.977Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec4c pc = 0x52a6cad9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.978Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.978Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 60 libmozglue.so!loadNSSLibs(char const*) [APKOpen.cpp:83c614479dda23c30da73bd2cd05d3d6b7545c82 : 0 + 0x3b] [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.978Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec8c pc = 0x52a6cad9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.979Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.979Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 61 libc.so + 0x109e9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.979Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ec90 pc = 0x400379eb [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.979Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.980Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 62 libc.so + 0xd9bf [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.980Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0eca8 pc = 0x400349c1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.980Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.981Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 63 libdvm.so + 0x4f8dd [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.981Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ecb0 pc = 0x4088d8df [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.981Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.981Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 64 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x634686 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.982Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ecb4 pc = 0x41ae9688 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.982Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.982Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 65 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x634686 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.983Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ecc0 pc = 0x41ae9688 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.983Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.983Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 66 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x634686 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.983Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0eccc pc = 0x41ae9688 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.984Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.984Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 67 libdvm.so + 0x550db [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.985Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ecd8 pc = 0x408930dd [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.985Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.985Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 68 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x634686 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.985Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ecdc pc = 0x41ae9688 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.985Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.986Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 69 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x634686 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.986Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ece4 pc = 0x41ae9688 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.986Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.986Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 70 libdvm.so + 0xae19e [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.987Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ece8 pc = 0x408ec1a0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.987Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.987Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 71 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x324a4a [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.987Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ecf0 pc = 0x4c78ba4c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.988Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.988Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 72 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x29a9c6 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.988Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ecf8 pc = 0x4174f9c8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.988Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.989Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 73 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x324a36 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.989Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed04 pc = 0x4c78ba38 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.989Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.990Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 74 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x627214 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.990Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed08 pc = 0x52519216 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.990Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.990Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 75 libdvm.so + 0x6b0b1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.991Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed18 pc = 0x408a90b3 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.991Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.992Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 76 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x627214 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.992Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed1c pc = 0x52519216 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.992Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.992Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 77 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0xfe072 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.993Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed20 pc = 0x51ff0074 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.993Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.993Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 78 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x29a9c6 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.993Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed24 pc = 0x4174f9c8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.994Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.994Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 79 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x627214 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.994Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed28 pc = 0x52519216 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.994Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.995Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 80 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x777ffe [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.995Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed2c pc = 0x5266a000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.995Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.996Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 81 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x324a36 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.996Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed38 pc = 0x4c78ba38 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.996Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.996Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 82 libdvm.so + 0xa9c86 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.997Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed50 pc = 0x408e7c88 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.997Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.997Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 83 libdvm.so + 0x385e3 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.998Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed58 pc = 0x408765e5 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.998Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.998Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 84 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x324a36 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.999Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed64 pc = 0x4c78ba38 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.999Z] 10:19:49 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:49.999Z] 10:19:49 INFO - 85 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x324a36 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.000Z] 10:19:49 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed68 pc = 0x4c78ba38 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.000Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.000Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 86 libdvm.so + 0x385d7 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.000Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed6c pc = 0x408765d9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.000Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.001Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 87 libdvm.so + 0xae19e [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.001Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed70 pc = 0x408ec1a0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.001Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.002Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 88 libdvm.so + 0x4f699 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.002Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed78 pc = 0x4088d69b [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.002Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.002Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 89 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x2bba00 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.003Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed84 pc = 0x521ada02 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.003Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.004Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 90 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x29a9c6 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.004Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed90 pc = 0x4174f9c8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.004Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.004Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 91 libdvm.so + 0x1ddbe [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.004Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ed94 pc = 0x4085bdc0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.004Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.005Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 92 libdvm.so + 0x27062 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.005Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0eda0 pc = 0x40865064 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.005Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.006Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 93 libdvm.so + 0x2de9a [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.006Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0edac pc = 0x4086be9c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.006Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.007Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 94 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x30c866 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.007Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0edc0 pc = 0x4c773868 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.007Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.008Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 95 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x2e3ffe [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.008Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0edc4 pc = 0x41799000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.008Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.008Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 96 libdvm.so + 0x2b582 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.009Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0edc8 pc = 0x40869584 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.009Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.009Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 97 data@app@org.mozilla.fennec_aurora-1.apk@classes.dex + 0x5c1ada [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.009Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee40 pc = 0x524b3adc [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.010Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.010Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 98 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x30c866 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.010Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee4c pc = 0x4c773868 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.011Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.011Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 99 libdvm.so + 0x5fcbf [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.011Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee58 pc = 0x4089dcc1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.011Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.012Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 100 dalvik-LinearAlloc (deleted) + 0x30c866 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.012Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee60 pc = 0x4c773868 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.012Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.013Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 101 dalvik-heap (deleted) + 0x2e3ffe [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.013Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee64 pc = 0x41799000 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.013Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.014Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 102 libdvm.so + 0xae19e [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.014Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee6c pc = 0x408ec1a0 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.014Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.014Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 103 libdvm.so + 0xae4aa [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.015Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee74 pc = 0x408ec4ac [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.015Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.015Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 104 libdvm.so + 0xae4a6 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.016Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee78 pc = 0x408ec4a8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.016Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.016Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 105 libdvm.so + 0x5fce9 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.016Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ee88 pc = 0x4089dceb [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.017Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.017Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 106 libdvm.so + 0x54a71 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.017Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0eea4 pc = 0x40892a73 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.017Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.017Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 107 libdvm.so + 0x549cf [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.018Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0eedc pc = 0x408929d1 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.018Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.018Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 108 libc.so + 0xca5a [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.019Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0eee8 pc = 0x40033a5c [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.019Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.019Z] 10:19:50 INFO - 109 libc.so + 0xcbd6 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.019Z] 10:19:50 INFO - sp = 0x52a0ef00 pc = 0x40033bd8 [task 2018-06-08T10:19:50.020Z] 10:19:50 INFO - Found by: stack scanning
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 38•6 years ago
|
||
Hmmm... we do reflow when the viewport info isn't even initialized? Which sounds pretty wrong. Botond, what do you think? Maybe we can ignore when viewport info is uninitialized? Or maybe we should request it to initialize in that case?
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz) → needinfo?(botond)
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 39•6 years ago
|
||
It looks like the viewport info is initialized on the first call to nsDocument::GetViewportInfo(), which may not have happened at the time this is called. I think we just need to call it from UpdateViewportOverflowType(), triggering the initialization if necessary.
Flags: needinfo?(botond)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 40•6 years ago
|
||
My concern is that, layout shouldn't be happening without having viewport info figured out, otherwise basically how can we get to know in what dimensions the content should be laid out? If we would eventually update the viewport info again, calling into GetViewportInfo from UpdateViewportOverflowType would be a waste work... Oh, but probably not that bad, since you can avoid many of the computation when they are needed... Okay, I guess...
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 42•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #40) > My concern is that, layout shouldn't be happening without having viewport > info figured out, otherwise basically how can we get to know in what > dimensions the content should be laid out? The computation of the viewport info in nsDocument::GetViewportInfo() is triggered in response to the following: * load event * dom-meta-added event * dom-meta-changed event * before-first-paint notification * full-zoom-changed notification * fullscreen-changed notification * PresShell::ResizeReflow The stack trace in comment 37 shows JS code executed as we parse an HTML document triggering reflow, without going through PresShell::ResizeReflow. I think that means that we perform a layout into the wrong dimensions, but will perform another layout into the correct dimensions before actually painting the page for the first time. I think that's ok (or at least, it's a pre-existing issue).
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 43•6 years ago
|
||
(In terms of what to do here, what the updated patch does (bailing from UpdateViewportOverflowType if the viewport info isn't initialized) seems appropriate.)
|
|
||
Comment 44•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by xquan@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/de1b1661fad8 Add a telemetry for out-of-reach overflowing on root. r=botond
|
||
Comment 45•6 years ago
|
||
Comment #7 was correct, all new data collections require Data Collection Review: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Data_Collection Please follow the instructions at that Wiki to gain data review. It shouldn't take long.
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
|
||
Comment 46•6 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/de1b1661fad8
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
status-firefox62:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla62
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 47•6 years ago
|
||
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
Attachment #8984627 -
Flags: review?(chutten)
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
status-firefox60:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox61:
--- → wontfix
|
|
||
Comment 48•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8984627 [details]
Request for data collection review form
DATA COLLECTION REVIEW RESPONSE:
Is there or will there be documentation that describes the schema for the ultimate data set available publicly, complete and accurate?
Histograms.json
Is there a control mechanism that allows the user to turn the data collection on and off?
Standard Telemetry mechanisms apply.
If the request is for permanent data collection, is there someone who will monitor the data over time?**
N/A
Using the category system of data types on the Mozilla wiki, what collection type of data do the requested measurements fall under?
Type 1, Technical. (Though determined by user web activity it is a technical aspect of how we render that activity more than it is a record, so Type 1)
Is the data collection request for default-on or default-off?
default-on (The code is written for prerelease only, but it can be all-channel. See Note)
Does the instrumentation include the addition of any new identifiers (whether anonymous or otherwise; e.g., username, random IDs, etc. See the appendix for more details)?
No. (categorical histograms' categories aren't identifiers)
Is the data collection covered by the existing Firefox privacy notice?
Yes
Does there need to be a check-in in the future to determine whether to renew the data?
Yes. :xidorn, you are responsible for removing the probe after its usefulness has ended.
---
Result: datareview+
Note:
I notice in your data review request you said you intended to collect this from all release channels. Without a "releaseChannelCollection" of value "opt-out" the Histogram will be recorded and reported only by nightly, aurora, and beta.
Was this intentional? If you want it to record data outside of those three channels you will need to change it. This Data Review will hold for that change if you opt for it.
Attachment #8984627 -
Flags: review?(chutten) → review+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 49•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Chris H-C :chutten from comment #48) > I notice in your data review request you said you intended to collect this > from all release channels. Without a "releaseChannelCollection" of value > "opt-out" the Histogram will be recorded and reported only by nightly, > aurora, and beta. > > Was this intentional? If you want it to record data outside of those three > channels you will need to change it. This Data Review will hold for that > change if you opt for it. I suppose it is off by default in release channel, but can be opt-in there, right? I think using the same setting as use counters is probably enough, and use counters are using opt-in, aren't they? So I guess using opt-in is probably enough for this...
|
|
||
Comment 50•6 years ago
|
||
There is no mechanism for users to opt-in to additional telemetry any more (long story), so if it is pre-release-only, we will only get data from pre-release users. I'm pretty sure you want this data from the release population, though, since pre-release populations aren't completely representative of the release population.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 51•6 years ago
|
||
Oh, I didn't know that we no longer have opt-in additional telemetry for users on release channel. I think it is a surprising change to many of us. Could you send an email to dev-platform and firefox-dev to elaborate this change and its motivation? I suspect that we would need to audit quite a bit of technical data collections which are supposed to have reports from portion of release users. And in that case, I think yes we would want it to be opt-out on release channel, then. Does it need extra data collection review, or can I just push a followup patch to add the one line?
Flags: needinfo?(chutten)
|
|
||
Comment 52•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Xidorn Quan [:xidorn] UTC+10 from comment #51) > Oh, I didn't know that we no longer have opt-in additional telemetry for > users on release channel. I think it is a surprising change to many of us. > Could you send an email to dev-platform and firefox-dev to elaborate this > change and its motivation? I suspect that we would need to audit quite a bit > of technical data collections which are supposed to have reports from > portion of release users. The change was made for us when the checkbox in Preferences was removed during some pre-Photon settings consolidation. I'm afraid we learned about it in much the same way you did :S I can't find the bug that removed the UI, but the client telemetry work to handle the ramifications was under bug 1406390 if you'd like to do some archaeology. I could've sworn there were emails to lists about this... maybe only as far as fx-data-dev. I can't find any now, nine months later. "Luckily" the population of release users who opted in to extended collection was small and non-representative. This made it useless for analyses we might've hoped to extrapolate to any other population (including the general release population). For example, I seem to recall that the population of opting-in users skewed heavily in the en-US direction so it wouldn't be a useful measure for extrapolating web feature use. > And in that case, I think yes we would want it to be opt-out on release > channel, then. Does it need extra data collection review, or can I just push > a followup patch to add the one line? I wrote the data review response assuming we'd be heading in this direction. You're good to go with a usual r+ for the change to Histograms.json
Flags: needinfo?(chutten)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 53•6 years ago
|
||
I think I'm good to go as a followup directly as it feels trivial enough...
|
|
||
Comment 54•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by xquan@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/e7d6ae2adfe2 followup - Make the telemetry opt-out on release channel.
|
||
Comment 55•6 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e7d6ae2adfe2
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 56•6 years ago
|
||
There is still no data coming for fennec. I suspect that
> "record_in_processes": ["content"]
doesn't work on fennec because there is no content process at all. We would need to add "main" to it.Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 57•6 years ago
|
||
Approval Request Comment [Feature/Bug causing the regression]: this bug which adds a telemetry we intended to collect on mobile but no data comes due to not recording on main process [User impact if declined]: we may not be able to collect enough information for evaluating solution of bug 1423013 [Is this code covered by automated tests?]: n/a [Has the fix been verified in Nightly?]: no [Needs manual test from QE? If yes, steps to reproduce]: no [List of other uplifts needed for the feature/fix]: no [Is the change risky?]: no [Why is the change risky/not risky?]: just a telemetry item change [String changes made/needed]: n/a
Flags: needinfo?(xidorn+moz)
Attachment #8992226 -
Flags: review?(botond)
Attachment #8992226 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
|
||
Comment 58•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8992226 [details] [diff] [review] followup 2 - record on main process Regressions should be fixed in a separate bug. Otherwise, it creates a bunch of different issues. Please create a dedicated bug for this. Thanks!
Attachment #8992226 -
Flags: review?(botond)
Attachment #8992226 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8992226 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta-
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 59•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8992226 [details] [diff] [review] followup 2 - record on main process Review of attachment 8992226 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Nice catch! Sorry for not noticing this during initial review. r+ to land this in a separate bug as Sylvestre suggested.
Attachment #8992226 -
Flags: review+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•