Closed Bug 1431401 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago

Intermittent bugs/957770-1.svg == bugs/957770-1-ref.svg | image comparison, max difference: 255, number of differing pixels: 872

Categories

(Testing :: Reftest, defect, P5)

Version 3
defect

Tracking

(firefox59 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla59
Tracking Status
firefox59 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Assigned: emilio)

Details

(Keywords: intermittent-failure, Whiteboard: [stockwell fixed:product])

Attachments

(1 file)

There are 33 failures related to this bug in the last bug. This is affecting linux64-ccov, opt builds.
Whiteboard: [stockwell needswork]
I am attempting to bisect the range a bit with 9 different pushes: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&author=jmaher@mozilla.com&fromchange=d28558d20169d6ec392044ce97c54ea7367c6886&tochange=152ed90bbb452d45b7b4872ac1c919de2f12f6c2 when results come in, I can do round 2 and after that completes we should have a single bug to point to.
ok, it is somewhere in 3 pushes: 16d1bd6dba91 Emilio Cobos Álvarez — Bug 1430608: Make nsMediaFeatures work with a document, not a pres context. r=heycam bec4537b2efd Emilio Cobos Álvarez — Bug 1429846: Fix slotted invalidation. r=heycam 1b62dd209727 Emilio Cobos Álvarez — servo: Merge #19790 - style: Work from multiple bugs (from emilio:fix-all-the-bugs); r=heycam,xidorn I can only get the top push to build (luckily it contains the bottom two), but this is failing. :emilio- can you help figure out why so many reftests are failing after these 3 patches landed?
Flags: needinfo?(emilio)
Is it so many reftests? Or so many times this reftest? Is it in some platform in particular?
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
it is a large variety of reftests on linux64 when built for code coverage.
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
Ok, so that's fascinating... These are only SVG reftests, and they seem to randomly have or have not antialiasing... Off-hand I wouldn't have suspected of any of my patches, but I just realized of something... I hate C++, and it's wild that this got into the tree unnoticed, and without any failure or warning. I suspect the incoming patch will fix this, if not I'll happily investigate more.
Flags: needinfo?(emilio)
Comment on attachment 8944030 [details] Bug 1431401: Initialise mIsSVGGlyphsDocument on the constructor. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/214348/#review220058 Thanks for writing up this patch
Attachment #8944030 - Flags: review?(jmaher) → review+
Pushed by ecoal95@gmail.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/4a651569fe8d Initialise mIsSVGGlyphsDocument on the constructor. r=jmaher
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla59
Assignee: nobody → emilio
Whiteboard: [stockwell needswork] → [stockwell fixed:product]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: