Unresponsive script waring appears in some tabs in some windows
Categories
(Core :: XPConnect, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: markus, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: dom-lws-bugdash-triage)
Attachments
(1 file)
|
969.00 KB,
image/gif
|
Details |
Updated•8 years ago
|
Updated•8 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
Are you still seeing this?
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
Note that the specific string has the identifier "nonspecific_tab":
processHang.nonspecific_tab.label = A web page is slowing down %1$S. To speed up your browser, stop that page.
It's used here.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
I do not know how to trigger that message and therefore can't test if I would still see this behaviour.
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
(In reply to Andrew Sutherland [:asuth] (he/him) from comment #2)
Note that the specific string has the identifier "nonspecific_tab":
processHang.nonspecific_tab.label = A web page is slowing down %1$S. To speed up your browser, stop that page.It's used here.
That logic seems to have been overhauled largely in bug 1694229 in the meantime. Moving it to that component and clearing severity for triage, maybe someone there knows if this has been addressed.
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
(In reply to Jens Stutte [:jstutte] from comment #4)
(In reply to Andrew Sutherland [:asuth] (he/him) from comment #2)
Note that the specific string has the identifier "nonspecific_tab":
processHang.nonspecific_tab.label = A web page is slowing down %1$S. To speed up your browser, stop that page.It's used here.
That logic seems to have been overhauled largely in bug 1694229 in the meantime. Moving it to that component and clearing severity for triage, maybe someone there knows if this has been addressed.
Hi Alex,
Can you help us verify if this issue is fixed along with Bug 1694229? Thank you.
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
I mean, yeah basically we are showing the notification if the process that we're trying to use to display a given tab is hung, regardless of whether that specific tab caused the hang or not. Honestly we could get really specific with the wording to point this out, but imo this is just not a priority. This is kind of different with the new logic introduced by bug 1694229, because we won't show the notification unless the user interacts with the tab, but I don't think this would qualify as fixed.
That being said, I don't think this is really worth addressing. We simply don't want to show a notification on all tabs if one content process is hung, and we can't just show nothing if one tab is hung because of a hanging script in another tab in the same process. So that leaves us with the option of making a long complicated message trying to explain precisely what is happening, but I doubt users will care to take the time to understand the nuance, so I think we're best with this the way it is. It's also less of an issue now with fission.
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
Yeah, sounds good Alex. That being said, I think we should just resolve this bug as WONTFIX.
Description
•