Inorrect Japanese character in Yu Gothic font using standard variant sequence
Categories
(Web Compatibility :: Site Reports, defect, P3)
Tracking
(firefox101 affected)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox101 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: lukasz.korczewski, Assigned: denschub)
References
()
Details
(5 keywords)
User Story
platform:windows,mac,linux,android impact:content-missing configuration:general affects:all branch:release
Attachments
(3 files)
Updated•7 years ago
|
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
See bug 1547409. Moving webcompat whiteboard tags to keywords.
Comment 7•3 years ago
•
|
||
After some research, using codepen.io and even introducing the URL in the toolbar, there is a difference in rendering.
Tested with:
Browser / Version: Firefox Nightly 101.0a1 (2022-04-08) (64-bit) / Chrome Version 100.0.4896.75 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Operating System: Windows 10 PRO x64
Notes:
- Reproducible regardless of the status of ETP.
- Reproducible on the latest build of Firefox Nightly.
- Works as expected using Chrome.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 8•3 years ago
|
||
Clear a needinfo that is pending on an inactive user.
Inactive users most likely will not respond; if the missing information is essential and cannot be collected another way, the bug maybe should be closed as INCOMPLETE.
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•1 year ago
|
||
Jonathan, do you know if this is still a valid issue, or if the fallback fonts changed or got updated? We haven't seen recent reports on this, and we're tempted to just close this as incomplete.
Comment 10•1 year ago
|
||
(In reply to Dennis Schubert [:denschub] from comment #9)
Jonathan, do you know if this is still a valid issue, or if the fallback fonts changed or got updated? We haven't seen recent reports on this, and we're tempted to just close this as incomplete.
Why don't you confirm it yourself? A test case is attached to this bug. Nothing has changed. Do I have to report the same problem periodically in order to avoid the bug is forgotten and closed as incomplete?
That said, I suggest closing this bug as INVALID because this is not a Firefox issue. (See my comment #3)
Comment 11•1 year ago
|
||
Yeah, as far as I can see this is simply a font bug: Yu Gothic has an incorrect glyph for U+F91E.
(FWIW, I also see the same wrong glyph in Chrome and Edge.)
Description
•