Open
Bug 1437716
Opened 8 years ago
Updated 3 years ago
Web Platform Tests for focus are failing
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Editor, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: mozilla-bugzilla, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(8 files)
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details | |
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details | |
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details | |
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details | |
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details | |
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details | |
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details | |
|
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0
Build ID: 20180212220112
Steps to reproduce:
Ran the Web Platform Tests related to focus (http://w3c-test.org/html/editing/focus/processing-model/focus-fixup-rule-one-no-dialogs.html)
Actual results:
Firefox fails 6/7 tests.
Expected results:
Firefox passes all tests.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → Editor
Product: Firefox → Core
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
This also fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=999619, where I've attached the patches the first time around.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950433 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Attachment #8950434 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Attachment #8950435 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Attachment #8950436 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Attachment #8950437 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Attachment #8950438 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Attachment #8950439 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Attachment #8950440 -
Flags: review?(m_kato)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → sorin.davidoi
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
I've been told this might also fall in Neil's area.
Flags: needinfo?(enndeakin)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950433 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950434 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950435 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950436 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950437 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950438 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950439 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950440 -
Flags: review?(m_kato) → review?(bugs)
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
The main issue here is that there are lots of other ways to hide an element that don't involve setting attributes, and while the cases here should be handled, there are lots of others that aren't.
Note also that the hidden and tabindex attributes don't have any meaning on elements in different namespaces, so shouldn't be treated as meaningful.
Flags: needinfo?(enndeakin)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Neil Deakin from comment #11)
> The main issue here is that there are lots of other ways to hide an element
> that don't involve setting attributes, and while the cases here should be
> handled, there are lots of others that aren't.
Is there a centralized place where this can be hooked into?
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
layout, basically CSSFrameConstructor should know whether some element loses its nsIFrame object.
Comment 14•8 years ago
|
||
Sorin, are you possibly updating the patches or should I review them now or what?
And sorry about delay.
Flags: needinfo?(sorin.davidoi)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8950433 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #8950434 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #8950435 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #8950436 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #8950437 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #8950438 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #8950439 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
Attachment #8950440 -
Flags: review?(bugs)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Olli Pettay [:smaug] from comment #13)
> layout, basically CSSFrameConstructor should know whether some element loses
> its nsIFrame object.
I tried poking around but I can't identify where this happens.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
| Reporter | ||
Comment 17•6 years ago
|
||
I think this can be set to unassigned since I'm not working on it anymore.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: sorin.davidoi → nobody
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•