Closed
Bug 1440164
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
APZ test hangs if subtest file is not added to mochitest.ini
Categories
(Core :: Panning and Zooming, defect, P3)
Core
Panning and Zooming
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla60
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox60 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: botond, Assigned: botond)
Details
(Whiteboard: [gfx-noted])
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
STR: 1. Write a new APZ mochitest helper_*.html file. 2. Add it as a subtest to a test group like test_group_wheelevents.html. 3. Forget to add it to support-files mochitest.ini 4. Run the test group Expected results: You get some sort of error message about the missing file. Actual results: The test run hangs. I just spent a lot of time debugging such a hang, only to realize that its cause is the sort of thing you'd expect to be caught as an immediate error.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] from comment #0) > 3. Forget to add it to support-files mochitest.ini That should say "to the support-files section in mochitest.ini".
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Whiteboard: [gfx-noted]
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → botond
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
(Going back to MozReview for the time being. There's no Autoland for Phabricator yet, and posting a series of patches is too much work.)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=3b1e04616876f1b037bbd366b37c49b0c35104d9
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953706 [details] Bug 1440164 - Call SimpleTest.finish() in runSubtestsSeriallyInFreshWindows(), instead of relying on its caller to call it. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/222938/#review228836 ::: gfx/layers/apz/test/mochitest/test_group_hittest.html:35 (Diff revision 1) > SimpleTest.waitForExplicitFinish(); > window.onload = function() { > - runSubtestsSeriallyInFreshWindows(subtests) > + runSubtestsSeriallyInFreshWindows(subtests); > - .then(SimpleTest.finish); I don't like that the waitForExplicitFinish() call happens in the test, but the finish call happens elsewhere. Although I don't feel too strongly about it - maybe if we renamed the function to runSubtestsSeriallyInFreshWindowsAndFinish it would be a little better? Or we could drop this part 1 and just update all the test files to do .then(SimpleTest.finish, SimpleTest.finish)? I kind of prefer the latter in case we write one of these tests that has additional cleanup to do after running the subtests but before calling SimpleTest.finish.
Attachment #8953706 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953707 [details] Bug 1440164 - Call SimpleTest.finish() in runSubtestsSeriallyInFreshWindows() even if running subtests failed. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/222940/#review228838
Attachment #8953707 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953708 [details] Bug 1440164 - Detect a subtest URL not resolving and give an error message. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/222942/#review228840
Attachment #8953708 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Botond Ballo [:botond] from comment #6) > https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/ > jobs?repo=try&revision=3b1e04616876f1b037bbd366b37c49b0c35104d9 Looks like I missed a call to runSubtestsSeriallyInFreshWindows() in dom/events/test/pointerevents/test_touch_action.html.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kartikaya Gupta (email:kats@mozilla.com) from comment #7) > I don't like that the waitForExplicitFinish() call happens in the test, but > the finish call happens elsewhere. Good point, that's not great. > Or > we could drop this part 1 and just update all the test files to do > .then(SimpleTest.finish, SimpleTest.finish)? > > I kind of prefer the latter in case we write one of these tests that has > additional cleanup to do after running the subtests but before calling > SimpleTest.finish. I don't love the repetition but I don't have a better idea, so let's do that.
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Attachment #8953706 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 14•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by bballo@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/da952030e9e4 Call SimpleTest.finish() in runSubtestsSeriallyInFreshWindows() even if running subtests failed. r=kats https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/bbceec48f282 Detect a subtest URL not resolving and give an error message. r=kats
Comment 15•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/da952030e9e4 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bbceec48f282
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla60
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•