Closed Bug 144253 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

large tarball cached while being saved; disk full report on wrong partition

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
minor

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 91795

People

(Reporter: mkrikis, Assigned: Matti)

Details

From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 BuildID: 2001051009 These are non-critical bugs, possibly merely wishlist items. There are a number of places for improvement here, the story follows. My disk cache size is set to 50M, it is in my /home partition. I was downloading a 68M tarball (.tar.gz), but there was not enough space for it in /home, so I was saving it to /tmp, which is in a different partition. While saving the tarball to /tmp (using some temporary file name), Mozilla was also cacheing it in Mozilla cache in my /home directory. Wish/bug #1: why cache *.tar.gz? Wish/bug #2: why cache something larger than space devoted to cache? Wish/bug #3: why cache something that is being saved to disk? Wish/bug #4: why cache something that is being saved to a different partition than where cache is (double the work for the disk)? When I ran out of space in /home partition (still plenty of space in /tmp), mozilla popped up a dialog saying that there is not enough space in /tmp. Bug #5: that was a lie---plenty of space in /tmp. If I'm not mistaken there was a suggestion to free some space or save elsewhere. I did free up space in /home, but it was too late--- I could not continue this save operation. Wish/bug #6: it would be nice to let the user click a "Continue" or "Ignore" button or something to repeat the check for space and continue saving if now possible. Wish/bug #7: or it would be nice to move the so far saved piece elsewhere without loosing anything and continue saving the rest there. Upon repeating the save operation of the same tarball at the same place I was offered to overwrite the incomplete previous save attemp. Wish/bug #8: perhaps in a case like this, Mozilla could offer to continue from the place where it bailed on previous attempt and not redo it from the beginning? Alright, this depends on server support, so we can forget about it. Would be nice, though. After finishing the save operation, the extra copy in the cache was immediately deleted. Wish/bug/question #9: why bother cacheing something that gets thrown out as soon as it has been downloaded? OK, so 1 bug, 8 wishes or questions. Maybe some of this can be addressed sometime? Thanks. Reproducible: Didn't try Steps to Reproduce: 1.Pick a large tar.gz file to be downloaded. 2.Make sure there isn't enough room for it in /home. 3.Save it to another partition, where there is room. Actual Results: out of space error given about the wrong partition, saving aborted even though there was enough space to save it... Expected Results: not cached, not ran out of space where I wasn't saving it, and happily saved where I had space. could have offered to continue or move elsewhere after I've freed some space...
You're seeing problems covered by bug 55690 and its (many) dependencies. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 55690 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Actaully, no. Reporter is seeing a different bug, but the "writing huge files to cache" bug just got fixed... (I can't find the bug# at the moment).
Boris: I just had a fairly concerted hunt for the "writing huge files to cache" bug, but I can't find it. On re-reading bug 55690, I agree that it may not be the best one to dupe this against, but several of the dependencies are relevant. Having just read loads of 'em, there are quite a few bugs kicking around on this whole topic, including a couple of flamewar^H^H^H debates.
Aha. I think Boris was referring to bug 91795, which is MUCH more relevant to the description given above. Re-opening to dupe properly, apologies for the spam this will create.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 91795 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
91795 seems to be about memory consumption, memory caches. The bug 144253 was about needless caching to disk. I don't think they have anything in common, but you may know better, especially if both are fixed by the same "new download manager" or something.
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.