Closed
Bug 144870
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
profile locking caused startup to slow down by 0.7% (12 ms)
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Profile: BackEnd, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: cathleennscp, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [ts])
Attachments
(1 obsolete file)
trunk checkin http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?module=MozillaTinderboxAll&date=explicit&mindate=1021472700&maxdate=1021474439 comet 1533 -> 1545 (+12ms, or +0.78%)
Summary: profile locking cuased startup to slow down by 0.7% (12 ms) → profile locking caused startup to slow down by 0.7% (12 ms)
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
A system call trace would be useful. Profile locking is not likely to be free, but it's necessary, so if we can show that the code is as fast as it can be, this bug should be WONTFIXed. /be
if --disable-profilelocking is not setted then will not be defined MOZ_PROFILELOCKING
Attachment #146475 -
Flags: review?(shaver)
erm. no. you can't do that. that's asking for serious profile corruption.
Assignee: ccarlen → nobody
Component: XP Miscellany → Profile Manager BackEnd
QA Contact: brendan → core.profile-manager-backend
Sorry for attachment to wrong bug. I want to send it to http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=240936 I am working for OOo, we use Mozilla components to access addressbooks in OOo in nearly readonly mode. See http://dba.openoffice.org for detail. So we need disable profile locking. I found that there is a config option --disable-profilelocking. But it does not work. So I need this patch.
Attachment #146475 -
Attachment description: add --disable-profilelocking support in nsProfile.cpp →
Attachment #146475 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #146475 -
Attachment is patch: false
Attachment #146475 -
Flags: review?(shaver)
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > A system call trace would be useful. > > Profile locking is not likely to be free, but it's necessary, so if we can show > that the code is as fast as it can be, this bug should be WONTFIXed. > > /be still worth checking?
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [ts]
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•