Closed
Bug 1451327
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Fonts with @font-face descriptor are bold
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: roxana.leitan, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(5 files)
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/61.0 Build ID: 20180404100127 [Affected versions]: Nightly 61.0a1 [Affected platforms]: Ubuntu 16.04 x64, Windows 10 x64 [Prerequisites]: Set pref gfx.downloadable_fonts.otl_validation = false [Steps to reproduce]: 1.Launch Nightly 61.0a1 with a new profile 2.Open the attached Html [Expected result]: The font should not be bold (as in Chrome) [Actual result]: The font is bold (please see the attached screenshot) [Note]: The issue is reproducible with "layout.css.font-variations.enabled" on False
The issue is reproducible on https://developer.microsoft.com page also
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to roxana.leitan@softvision.ro from comment #0) > Created attachment 8964910 [details] > font-face .html > Are you sure the right version of this test file was attached? This file does not actually apply the webfont to any content; and so the screenshot (attachment 8964911 [details]) just shows a difference in default fonts between the Chrome and Firefox configurations.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(roxana.leitan)
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
I don't think this is valid/actionable as filed, per comment 3. I'll attach an updated example that uses @font-face to load a webfont and applies it to the text, which should be usable as a testcase. (It loads the font resource directly from the axis-praxis.org site, which may not be guaranteed to remain available; an alternative would be to download the .woff2 file and put in the same directory as the testcase, and then just use the plain filename in the src: descriptors instead of the https://... url.)
Updated•6 years ago
|
status-firefox60:
--- → wontfix
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Is there anything to do here, given the updated example (comment 4), or can we close this issue?
Flags: needinfo?(roxana.leitan)
Based on this attachment I think we should close this bug
Flags: needinfo?(roxana.leitan)
Updated•6 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•