Closed
Bug 145397
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
0.5% slowdown on pageload, 1.0branch
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Core
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: cathleennscp, Assigned: john)
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression)
2nd 0.5% regression on pageload (tp), immediately follow by 1st 0.5% pageload
regression on branch (bug 144863)
2176 -> 2185 -> 2188 ( +12ms, or 0.55%)
these are the only cvs updates from both build logs
U mozilla/docshell/base/nsDocShell.cpp
U mozilla/embedding/components/webbrowserpersist/src/nsWebBrowserPersist.cpp
U mozilla/modules/plugin/base/src/nsIPluginHost.h
U mozilla/netwerk/base/public/nsIFileStreams.idl
U mozilla/netwerk/base/src/nsFileStreams.cpp
U mozilla/netwerk/base/src/nsFileStreams.h
U mozilla/string/macbuild/string.xml
U mozilla/xpcom/io/nsMultiplexInputStream.cpp
U mozilla/content/html/content/src/nsFormSubmission.cpp
U mozilla/content/html/content/src/nsHTMLInputElement.cpp
and
U mozilla/editor/libeditor/html/nsHTMLEditorLog.cpp
Checkins during this period:
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=MozillaBranchTinderboxAll&branch=MOZILLA_1_0_0_BRANCH&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=5%2F14%2F2002+21%3A00%3A00&maxdate=5%2F15%2F2002+02%3A00%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot
Keywords: perf,
regression
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Given that that number continued to rise without anyone's help after that, and
given that this checkin did not affect Tp on trunk at all, I am somewhat
skeptical that the machine is being wacky (I have seen other Tinder machines
mysteriously rise and fall to consistent new performance levels without any
checkins). I don't have a machine with 0.5% resolution to test this, nor can I
see anything obvious that would cause a performance problem.
If you so desire I can back this out temporarily to see if it fixes the problem.
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
any of the testerbox machines are available for testing, we've got good
resolution there.
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
nsbeta1- based on comment #1. If this is issue on the trunk please clear the (-)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Branch is old, this has beta1-. Unclear if there is a bug, as well. Closing.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•