Closed
Bug 1454311
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Crash in libxul.so@0xdbd391 | libxul.so@0xfc5d29 | libxul.so@0x3785b2d | libxul.so@0xa62148 | libxul.so@0x8effeb | libxul.so@0x475cd83 | libxul.so@0xa54ffc | libxul.so@0xa554ee | libxul.so@0x475cd83 | libxul.so@0xa585bf | libxul.so@0x475cd83 | libxul.s...
Categories
(Core :: XUL, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: matrix.org, Unassigned)
Details
Crash Data
This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is
report bp-2ec3e30a-f223-4541-a2e6-b4b690180416.
=============================================================
Top 10 frames of crashing thread:
0 libxul.so libxul.so@0xdbd391
1 libxul.so libxul.so@0xfc5d29
2 libxul.so libxul.so@0x3785b2d
3 libxul.so libxul.so@0xa62148
4 libxul.so libxul.so@0x8effeb
5 libxul.so libxul.so@0x475cd83
6 libxul.so libxul.so@0xa54ffc
7 libxul.so libxul.so@0xa554ee
8 libxul.so libxul.so@0x475cd83
9 libxul.so libxul.so@0xa585bf
=============================================================
This crash happens "randomly" often after clicking a link. However after restart clicking the same link usually won't cause a crash. It is not uncommon for FF to run for 10s of minutes between crashes, although they are often more common.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: XUL → General
This looks similar to the crash in bug 1452128.
See Also: → 1452128
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Emma: why do you believe these are similar? This appears to be an assertion (see the MOZ_CRASH_REASON in Metadata - mWorkerThread == current virtual thread assert), and that doesn't appear in the other. Also, this appears to be a non-mozilla build, which we can't symbolicate, which is why all the libxul.so stuff; there's no reason to think that's related to the raspberry pi libxul crashes (again, we don't do that build, so we don't have symbols for it)
Flags: needinfo?(ehumphries)
Yes, this is my misreading those and forgetting that this was a packager build.
Flags: needinfo?(ehumphries)
See Also: 1452128 →
Which distro is this, Kevin? You may need to follow up with the packagers.
Flags: needinfo?(kevincox)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
This was on Arch Linux. I tried rebuilding with less optimization and enabling debug symbols but it didn't appear to show up in the uploaded crash dumps. The final workaround was doing a profile refresh which prevented the bug from triggering.
Flags: needinfo?(kevincox)
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: General → XUL
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Triage: sadly this is not actionable & with no stack trace or function names to dedup. Given that a profile refresh fix this I am going to close this as WFM. Feel free to reopen if there is more related information (e.g. if you'd saved the profile and being able to produce the same crash with stack).
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Are there instructions for complaining with debug symbols? I couldn't find them and some promising sounding flags didn't do the truck.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•