Closed Bug 1454346 Opened 2 years ago Closed 2 years ago
.06% Resident Memory (linux64-qr) regression on push 2efe54944e8c (Fri Apr 13 2018)
We have detected an awsy regression from push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=a6f674d433fce89a550c232351885b6f93fe606a&tochange=2efe54944e8cb91f1198d0c55ccb440de5b37997 As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 24% Resident Memory linux64-qr opt stylo 1,172,348,020.08 -> 1,454,359,173.67 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=12712 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/AWSY/Tests
:aosmond This regressions happens only on the Linux x64 QR platform. Is this something we can fix or should we consider accepting it or maybe back it out?
When bug 1453801 relands, I will ensure this regression is avoided then.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
The relanding of the bug's 1453801 new implementation resolved the resident memory regression. As observed by aosmond, we got this regression instead. == Change summary for alert #12873 (as of Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:57:28 GMT) == Regressions: 26% Images linux64-qr opt stylo 5,346,245.37 -> 6,743,586.09 Improvements: 8% Resident Memory linux64-qr opt stylo 1,171,507,100.03 -> 1,079,530,212.23 For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=12873
Yes. Unfortunately we'll have to accept the images increase -- if you compare it to linux64, they are now very similar, which is what I would expect. WebRender isn't doing anything special to reduce our rasterized image footprint as compared to non-WebRender. As it turns out, we were actually underreporting WebRender consumption due to bugs I resolved in bug 1453801.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.