Closed
Bug 1460897
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Dictionary Add-ons not recognised by 62.01a
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1460629
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr52 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox60 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox61 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox62 | --- | fix-optional |
People
(Reporter: alexf_ba124, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0
Build ID: 20180511100427
Steps to reproduce:
Attempted to install https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/latin-dictionary/ on the Nightly 62.0a1 dated (2018-05-11)
Actual results:
Firefox claimed the add-on wasn't compatible with the version.
Expected results:
The dictionary add-on should have installed normally. ( However a warning was given suggesting it's the add-on that needs updating.)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Given that this has occured with some other dicitionary add-ons as well, I am wondering if certain validation requirements were tightened up in the 62.x tree (Would have listed this version driectly, but Bugzilla doesn't give that version as an option yet).
I have seen multiple reports on IRC from Nightly users and dictionaries not working.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Blocks: 1457072
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
status-firefox60:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox61:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox62:
--- → affected
status-firefox-esr52:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox-esr60:
--- → unaffected
Component: Untriaged → Add-ons Manager
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: regression
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
Version: unspecified → 62 Branch
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Looks like this is about to be fixed in the next Nightly build or so.
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
This still isn't fixed, though a workaround for users is described in bug 14060629.
The underlying issue is now tracked in bug 1462056.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•