Closed Bug 1460952 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

Clean up dictionaries in l10n repos

Categories

(Mozilla Localizations :: Other, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: flod, Assigned: flod)

References

Details

I confess I've never looked at the dictionaries shipping across languages, and there seems to be a lot of space for clean ups. https://dxr.mozilla.org/l10n-central/search?q=path%3A.dic&redirect=false Possible broken locales: > el/extensions/spellcheck/el.dic Would this even work, out of the hunspell folder? Need to try a Greek build. Locales with en-US dictionary: > ja-JP-mac/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > ja/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > km/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > lij/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > or/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > ta/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > zh-TW/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic I think these were copied by localizers at the time, when working directly on hg. Probably worth filing a bug for ja and zh-TW, but the others should just be removed (IMO). zh-TW was copied from ja, and never updated https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/zh-TW/log/tip/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic The Japanese one is years behind https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/ja/log/tip/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic Locales with a lot of extra "stuff" that should just be removed. https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/km/file/tip/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/dictionary-sources https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/lij/file/tip/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/dictionary-sources
(In reply to Francesco Lodolo [:flod] from comment #0) > I think these were copied by localizers at the time, when working directly > on hg. Probably worth filing a bug for ja and zh-TW, but the others should > just be removed (IMO). To clarify: I don't think it was a conscious choice to add it for any of these languages, with the exception of ja and zh-TW. In these two cases, I'd like to understand why it's useful to ship an English dictionary, in particular considering that nobody is updating it, and there are better choices available on AMO.
Depends on: 1461567
Depends on: 1461569
Depends on: 1461571
Depends on: 1461626
I think this is as much we could clean up.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(In reply to Francesco Lodolo [:flod] from comment #0) > Locales with en-US dictionary: > > > ja-JP-mac/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > > ja/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > > km/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > > lij/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > > or/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > > ta/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > > zh-TW/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/en-US.dic > > I think these were copied by localizers at the time, when working directly > on hg. Probably worth filing a bug for ja and zh-TW, but the others should > just be removed (IMO). I realized that, in the end, I didn't really remove them for km, lij, or, ta. https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/km/rev/5884668360830cc123c43d2121e49f92164b891f https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/lij/rev/465e7e161ec5efd837e4d31df49ad3867ebeec7a https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/or/rev/8c6d61be98470e4807068ef5a0a1d1b9603fe4d3 https://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/ta/rev/4ab976c7a777f2157524aab49eb6ee16c6464073 Rationale for removing en-US: - We're working on improving feature discoverability - These languages don't have a maintainer on Mercurial, and this dictionary is obsolete
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.