Closed
Bug 1462168
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Report numbers of toplevel actors in about:memory (or somewhere)
Categories
(Core :: IPC, enhancement, P2)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla63
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox63 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: jld, Assigned: jld)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [MemShrink:P2])
Attachments
(1 file)
Bug 1461875 comment #2 suggests that we may be leaking toplevel IPC actors in some circumstances, or at least allocating a large enough number of them that we should understand why. (It's possible that those could be some other stream-type Unix-domain sockets, but that's something else we don't have data to answer at present. One thing I can rule out are the one-shot response sockets used by the sandbox file broker: those are SOCK_SEQPACKET, not SOCK_STREAM.) It looks like the best place to do this is in MessageChannel: it has the actor name, and it also knows when the transport is cross-process, and it already has a memory reporter.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Writing this down here for future reference in case it's relevant: PStreamFilter looks suspicious here; see bug 1255894, and especially the Part 10 patch which makes it a top-level actor instead of managed by PBackground (which has a per-thread singleton). If I'm following the code correctly, each StreamFilter object[*] has its own message transport (socketpair, on Unix). That would explain transient spikes in fd usage, but not the reports I've seen of large numbers of stream sockets when idle, unless there's a leak somewhere. [*] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/webRequest/StreamFilter
Updated•6 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [MemShrink] → [MemShrink:P2]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Note to self: It might also be useful to record a per-class high-water mark.
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Example (parent): 26 (100.0%) -- ipc-channels ├───8 (30.77%) ── PBackgroundParent ├───3 (11.54%) ── PCompositorManagerParent ├───3 (11.54%) ── PContentParent ├───3 (11.54%) ── PImageBridgeParent ├───3 (11.54%) ── PProcessHangMonitorParent ├───3 (11.54%) ── PProfilerParent └───3 (11.54%) ── PVRManagerParent 35 (100.0%) -- ipc-channels-peak ├──11 (31.43%) ── PBackgroundParent ├───4 (11.43%) ── PCompositorManagerParent ├───4 (11.43%) ── PContentParent ├───4 (11.43%) ── PImageBridgeParent ├───4 (11.43%) ── PProcessHangMonitorParent ├───4 (11.43%) ── PProfilerParent └───4 (11.43%) ── PVRManagerParent Partial example (content): 9 (100.0%) -- ipc-channels ├──3 (33.33%) ── PBackgroundChild ├──1 (11.11%) ── PCompositorManagerChild ├──1 (11.11%) ── PContentChild ├──1 (11.11%) ── PImageBridgeChild ├──1 (11.11%) ── PProcessHangMonitorChild ├──1 (11.11%) ── PProfilerChild └──1 (11.11%) ── PVRManagerChild
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8993567 [details] Bug 1462168 - Report number of IPC channels in about:memory. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/258276/#review265484
Attachment #8993567 -
Flags: review?(continuation) → review+
Pushed by jedavis@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/81d6e0ddef07 Report number of IPC channels in about:memory. r=mccr8
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/81d6e0ddef07
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
status-firefox63:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla63
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•