Closed Bug 1466094 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

[wpt-sync] Sync PR 11295 - Add 'textPath' tests: 'side' attribute, text on basic shapes.

Categories

(Core :: SVG, enhancement, P4)

enhancement

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla63
Tracking Status
firefox63 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: mozilla.org, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

(Whiteboard: [wptsync downstream])

Sync web-platform-tests PR 11295 into mozilla-central (this bug is closed when the sync is complete).

PR: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/11295
Details from upstream follow.

Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr> wrote:
>  Add 'textPath' tests: 'side' attribute, text on basic shapes.
>  
>  Inkscape master and Firefox v62 pass these tests.
Component: web-platform-tests → SVG
Product: Testing → Core
Whiteboard: [wptsync downstream] → [wptsync downstream error]
Whiteboard: [wptsync downstream error] → [wptsync downstream]
Failed to get results from try push
Pushed by wptsync@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/a551eeb62985
[wpt PR 11295] - Add 'textPath' tests: 'side' attribute, text on basic shapes., a=testonly
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/fab81b8d80ee
[wpt PR 11295] - Update wpt metadata, a=testonly
Pushed by archaeopteryx@coole-files.de:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/6e362a6a00d9
[wpt PR 11295] - Add 'textPath' tests: 'side' attribute, text on basic shapes., a=testonly
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/31fb6de8a8ff
[wpt PR 11295] - Update wpt metadata, a=testonly
Hi Sean -- Can you find someone to look into the wpt failures?  Thanks.
Flags: needinfo?(mreavy) → needinfo?(svoisen)
heycam - This test was backed out. Do we want to get it back on?
Flags: needinfo?(svoisen) → needinfo?(cam)
It was relanded in comment 6.
Flags: needinfo?(cam)
http://w3c-test.org/svg/text/reftests/textpath-side-001-ref.svg seems to match http://w3c-test.org/svg/text/reftests/textpath-side-001.svg visually for me.

Perhaps wpt needs to have some kind of fuzzy match capability like reftests have if there's a difference of a pixel or two.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.