[meta] JS Actor APIs to replace FrameScripts for Fission

ASSIGNED
Assigned to

Status

()

enhancement
P2
normal
ASSIGNED
11 months ago
6 days ago

People

(Reporter: relaas, Assigned: jdai)

Tracking

(Depends on 5 bugs, Blocks 2 bugs, {meta})

unspecified
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Fission Milestone:M2)

Details

Comment hidden (empty)

Comment 1

10 months ago
Thomas: Can we get details here?
Flags: needinfo?(telin)

Updated

10 months ago
Priority: -- → P3
Flags: needinfo?(telin)
Assignee: nobody → jdai
Priority: P3 → P2
(Assignee)

Updated

4 months ago
Depends on: 1513876
(Assignee)

Updated

4 months ago
Depends on: 1513877
(Assignee)

Updated

4 months ago
Depends on: 1513878
Blocks: 1475415
No longer depends on: 1475415

Updated

3 months ago
Blocks: 1467214
No longer blocks: browsingcontext
(Assignee)

Updated

3 months ago
Depends on: 1523631

Updated

3 months ago
Fission Milestone: --- → M1
Fission Milestone: M1 → M2
Summary: Design and implement framescript replacement APIs on Abstract Browsing Context Trees → [meta] JS Actor APIs to replace FrameScripts for Fission
(Assignee)

Updated

2 months ago
Depends on: 1526406

Can we please get the details in a publicly available document?

Flags: needinfo?(jdai)
(Assignee)

Comment 4

2 months ago

(In reply to Tomislav Jovanovic :zombie from comment #3)

Can we please get the details in a publicly available document?

It would be nice to document at MDN or wiki after we finish.

Flags: needinfo?(jdai)

(In reply to John Dai[:jdai] from comment #2)

Fission JS IPC:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ALC8TxBy4pfS2tzI8Mb8Z3Nr5dzSjYYPSQxMn00_aWE/edit?ts=5bf786b3

I was referencing this (I'm assuming) design doc, are there reasons to keep engineering details non-public?

Flags: needinfo?(jdai)
(Assignee)

Updated

2 months ago
Depends on: 1528387
(Assignee)

Comment 6

2 months ago

(In reply to Tomislav Jovanovic :zombie from comment #5)

(In reply to John Dai[:jdai] from comment #2)

Fission JS IPC:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ALC8TxBy4pfS2tzI8Mb8Z3Nr5dzSjYYPSQxMn00_aWE/edit?ts=5bf786b3

I was referencing this (I'm assuming) design doc, are there reasons to keep engineering details non-public?

I believe we should go for the public, however, the design document which you reference isn't fully complete, the API's still changing slightly while we implementing. If you don't mind can you please wait for a while, once we finished all the API, we will update the design document as well. :)

Flags: needinfo?(jdai)
Depends on: 1531163
(Assignee)

Updated

2 months ago
Depends on: 1531837
Duplicate of this bug: 1436504
(Assignee)

Updated

2 months ago
Depends on: 1533401
(Assignee)

Updated

2 months ago
Depends on: 1527753
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
Product: Core → Core
(Assignee)

Updated

26 days ago
Depends on: 1539147

Updated

19 days ago
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
No longer depends on: 1532795
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.